Ryou M, Fong D G, Pai R D, Rattner D W, Thompson C C
Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Endoscopy. 2008 May;40(5):432-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995691. Epub 2008 Apr 11.
Transluminal closure is fundamental to the safe introduction of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) into humans. Suture, staples, and clips have been used. We aimed to evaluate the acute strength of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure techniques in an ex vivo porcine model by assessing air leak pressures.
The following closure modalities were assessed with at least five samples per arm: conventional open/laparoscopic suturing techniques including full-thickness interrupted sutures, double-layer sutures, and purse-string sutures, as well as endoscopic clips and endoscopic staples. Historical values for transgastric closures with hand-sewn interrupted sutures, endoscopic clips, and a prototype endoscopic suture device were used from our laboratory's prior study.
Using Kruskal-Wallis analysis, the overall comparisons were significant ( P = 0.0038 for gastrotomy closure; P = 0.0018 for colotomy closure). Post hoc paired comparisons revealed that the difference between all closure arms versus negative control were significant. Significance could not be established among the various closure arms. However, trends suggested hand-sewn double-layer sutures, endoscopic staples, and both hand-sewn and endoscopically-placed purse-string sutures produced the strongest closures. Furthermore, endoscopic clips appeared sufficient for colotomy closure when ideally placed.
Suture (both hand-sewn and endoscopically deployed) appears to produce the strongest closures in both stomach and colon, with the important caveats that (1) a continuous through-thickness suture track be avoided, such as in the full-thickness closure, or (2) suture holes be buried, such as in the purse-string configuration. When suture tracks are full-thickness, they can serve as leak sites. Staples and clips can produce comparable closures, but only under ideal conditions.
腔内闭合对于将自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)安全引入人体至关重要。已使用缝线、吻合钉和夹子。我们旨在通过评估漏气压力,在体外猪模型中评估各种胃切开术和结肠切开术闭合技术的急性强度。
对以下闭合方式进行评估,每组至少五个样本:传统开放/腹腔镜缝合技术,包括全层间断缝合、双层缝合和荷包缝合,以及内镜夹和内镜吻合钉。我们实验室之前的研究使用了手工间断缝合、内镜夹和一种原型内镜缝合装置进行经胃闭合的历史数据。
使用Kruskal-Wallis分析,总体比较具有显著性(胃切开术闭合P = 0.0038;结肠切开术闭合P = 0.0018)。事后配对比较显示,所有闭合组与阴性对照组之间的差异具有显著性。不同闭合组之间无法确定显著性。然而,趋势表明手工双层缝合、内镜吻合钉以及手工和内镜放置的荷包缝合产生的闭合强度最强。此外,内镜夹在放置理想时似乎足以用于结肠切开术闭合。
缝线(手工缝合和内镜放置)似乎在胃和结肠中都能产生最强的闭合效果,但有重要的注意事项:(1)避免连续的全层缝合路径,如全层闭合时;或(2)将缝合孔埋入,如荷包缝合结构。当缝合路径为全层时,它们可作为漏气部位。吻合钉和夹子在理想条件下可产生类似的闭合效果。