• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨通道视觉干扰物一致性效应的电生理相关性:反应冲突的证据

Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: evidence for response conflict.

作者信息

Forster Bettina, Pavone Enea F

机构信息

Department of Psychology, City University, London, England.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Mar;8(1):65-73. doi: 10.3758/cabn.8.1.65.

DOI:10.3758/cabn.8.1.65
PMID:18405047
Abstract

To investigate the basis of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects, we recorded event-related brain potentials (ERP) while participants performed a tactile location-discrimination task. Participants made speeded tactile location-discrimination responses to tactile targets presented to the index fingers or thumbs while ignoring simultaneously presented task-irrelevant visual distractor stimuli at either the same (congruent) or a different (incongruent) location. Behavioural results were in line with previous studies, showing slowed response times and increased error rates on incongruent compared with congruent visual distractor trials. To clarify the effect of visual distractors on tactile processing, concurrently recorded ERPs were analyzed for poststimulus, preresponse, and postresponse modulations. An enhanced negativity was found in the time range of the N2 component on incongruent compared with congruent visual distractor trials prior to correct responses. In addition, postresponse ERPs showed the presence of error-related negativity components on incorrect-response trials and enhanced negativity for congruent-incorrect compared with incongruent-incorrect trials. This pattern of ERP results has previously been related to response conflict (Yeung, Botvinick, & Cohen, 2004). Importantly, no modulation of early somatosensory ERPs was present prior to the N2 time range, which may have suggested the contribution of other perceptual or postperceptual processes to crossmodal congruency effects. Taken together, our results suggest that crossmodal visual distractor effects are largely due to response conflict.

摘要

为了探究跨模态视觉干扰物一致性效应的基础,我们在参与者执行触觉位置辨别任务时记录了事件相关脑电位(ERP)。参与者对呈现于食指或拇指的触觉目标做出快速的触觉位置辨别反应,同时忽略在相同(一致)或不同(不一致)位置同时呈现的与任务无关的视觉干扰刺激。行为结果与先前的研究一致,表明与一致的视觉干扰试验相比,不一致试验的反应时间减慢且错误率增加。为了阐明视觉干扰物对触觉加工的影响,我们对同时记录的ERP进行了刺激后、反应前和反应后调制分析。在正确反应之前,与一致的视觉干扰试验相比,不一致试验在N2成分的时间范围内发现了增强的负波。此外,反应后的ERP显示,在错误反应试验中存在错误相关的负波成分,并且与不一致-错误试验相比,一致-错误试验的负波增强。这种ERP结果模式先前已与反应冲突相关(杨、博特维尼克和科恩,2004年)。重要的是,在N2时间范围之前没有早期体感ERP的调制,这可能表明其他感知或感知后过程对跨模态一致性效应有贡献。综上所述,我们的结果表明跨模态视觉干扰物效应主要是由于反应冲突。

相似文献

1
Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: evidence for response conflict.跨通道视觉干扰物一致性效应的电生理相关性:反应冲突的证据
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Mar;8(1):65-73. doi: 10.3758/cabn.8.1.65.
2
Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.视觉触觉一致性效应的时间因素
Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jan 9;392(1-2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.001. Epub 2005 Oct 6.
3
The rapid distraction of attentional resources toward the source of incongruent stimulus input during multisensory conflict.在多感觉冲突期间,注意力资源迅速分散到不一致刺激输入的来源。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Apr;25(4):623-35. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00336. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
4
Gating at early cortical processing stages is associated with changes in behavioural performance on a sensory conflict task.早期皮层处理阶段的门控与感觉冲突任务中行为表现的变化有关。
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jan 15;317:179-187. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
5
When far is near: ERP correlates of crossmodal spatial interactions between tactile and mirror-reflected visual stimuli.当远即近:ERP 对应于触觉和镜像视觉刺激之间的跨模态空间相互作用。
Neurosci Lett. 2011 Aug 1;500(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.05.233. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
6
An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.一项关于个人周边空间和个人外部空间中视觉触觉交互作用的事件相关电位研究:空间规则的证据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1550-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21109.
7
Crossing the hands disrupts tactile spatial attention but not motor attention: evidence from event-related potentials.双手交叉会干扰触觉空间注意力,但不会干扰运动注意力:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jul;50(9):2303-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.034. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
8
Multisensory interactions follow the hands across the midline: evidence from a non-spatial visual-tactile congruency task.多感官交互作用随着双手越过身体中线:来自非空间视觉 - 触觉一致性任务的证据。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 10;1077(1):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.11.010. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
9
Trait anxiety and dynamic adjustments in conflict processing.特质焦虑与冲突处理中的动态调整。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 Sep;10(3):372-81. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.3.372.
10
The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.反应冲突、多感官整合以及身体介导的注意对跨通道一致性效应的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):873-887. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4849-4. Epub 2016 Dec 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.反应冲突、多感官整合以及身体介导的注意对跨通道一致性效应的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Mar;235(3):873-887. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4849-4. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
2
A perspective on neural and cognitive mechanisms of error commission.关于错误发生的神经和认知机制的观点。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Mar 3;9:50. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00050. eCollection 2015.
3
"Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.

本文引用的文献

1
Altered tactile spatial attention in the early blind.早期失明者触觉空间注意力的改变。
Brain Res. 2007 Feb 2;1131(1):149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.004. Epub 2006 Dec 14.
2
Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect.视觉触觉一致性效应的时间因素
Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jan 9;392(1-2):96-100. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.001. Epub 2005 Oct 6.
3
Integration of visual and tactile stimuli: top-down influences require time.视觉与触觉刺激的整合:自上而下的影响需要时间。
“智能抑制”:任务转换过程中冲突产生任务规则被抑制的电生理证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Sep;11(3):292-308. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0037-y.
4
Perceptual decisions formed by accumulation of audiovisual evidence in prefrontal cortex.前额叶皮层中视听证据积累形成的知觉决策。
J Neurosci. 2010 May 26;30(21):7434-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0455-10.2010.
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):509-17. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2391-x. Epub 2005 Aug 6.
4
Vision and gaze direction modulate tactile processing in somatosensory cortex: evidence from event-related brain potentials.视觉与注视方向调节体感皮层的触觉加工:来自事件相关脑电位的证据
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Aug;165(1):8-18. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-2274-1. Epub 2005 May 10.
5
Covert attention in touch: behavioral and ERP evidence for costs and benefits.触觉中的隐蔽注意:成本与收益的行为及事件相关电位证据
Psychophysiology. 2005 Mar;42(2):171-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00268.x.
6
The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity.错误检测的神经基础:冲突监测与错误相关负波。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.939.
7
Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task.多感官对人类视觉触觉近体空间三维表征的贡献:来自跨通道一致性任务的证据。
J Physiol Paris. 2004 Jan-Jun;98(1-3):171-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.008.
8
Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects.视觉-触觉跨模态干扰物一致性效应的空间限制
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;4(2):148-69. doi: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.148.
9
Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention.手部姿势对触觉空间注意力中准备性控制过程和感觉调制的影响。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Mar;115(3):596-608. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.015.
10
The attentional selection of spatial and non-spatial attributes in touch: ERP evidence for parallel and independent processes.触觉中空间和非空间属性的注意选择:事件相关电位证据支持并行和独立过程
Biol Psychol. 2004 Mar;66(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.08.001.