Hoffmann Sven, Beste Christian
Performance Psychology, Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne Cologne, Germany.
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Germany.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2015 Mar 3;9:50. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00050. eCollection 2015.
Behavioral adaptation and cognitive control are crucial for goal-reaching behaviors. Every creature is ubiquitously faced with choices between behavioral alternatives. Common sense suggests that errors are an important source of information in the regulation of such processes. Several theories exist regarding cognitive control and the processing of undesired outcomes. However, most of these models focus on the consequences of an error, and less attention has been paid to the mechanisms that underlie the commissioning of an error. In this article, we present an integrative review of neuro-cognitive models that detail the determinants of the occurrence of response errors. The factors that may determine the likelihood of committing errors are likely related to the stability of task-representations in prefrontal networks, attentional selection mechanisms and mechanisms of action selection in basal ganglia circuits. An important conclusion is that the likelihood of committing an error is not stable over time but rather changes depending on the interplay of different functional neuro-anatomical and neuro-biological systems. We describe factors that might determine the time-course of cognitive control and the need to adapt behavior following response errors. Finally, we outline the mechanisms that may proof useful for predicting the outcomes of cognitive control and the emergence of response errors in future research.
行为适应和认知控制对于实现目标的行为至关重要。每个生物都普遍面临着行为选择之间的抉择。常识表明,错误是调节此类过程的重要信息来源。关于认知控制和不良结果的处理存在几种理论。然而,这些模型大多关注错误的后果,而对错误发生的潜在机制关注较少。在本文中,我们对详细阐述反应错误发生决定因素的神经认知模型进行了综合综述。可能决定犯错可能性的因素可能与前额叶网络中任务表征的稳定性、注意力选择机制以及基底神经节回路中的动作选择机制有关。一个重要的结论是,犯错的可能性并非随时间稳定不变,而是会根据不同功能神经解剖和神经生物学系统的相互作用而变化。我们描述了可能决定认知控制时间进程以及在反应错误后调整行为必要性的因素。最后,我们概述了在未来研究中可能有助于预测认知控制结果和反应错误出现的机制。