Opdenacker Joke, Boen Filip, Coorevits Nele, Delecluse Christophe
Department of Human Kinesiology, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, K.U.Leuven, Tervuursevest 101, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
Prev Med. 2008 Jun;46(6):518-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.02.017. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
To evaluate the effects of a lifestyle intervention and a structured exercise intervention on physical activity in older adults.
Participants were randomly assigned to a lifestyle intervention (n=60), including an individualized home-based program supported by phone calls, or to a structured intervention (n=60) consisting of three weekly supervised sessions. Results were compared with a control group (n=66). Physical activity was measured with self-report questionnaires, pedometers, and accelerometers before the start (pretest), at the end (11 months, posttest), and after 23 months (follow-up). The study took place in Belgium from March 2004 until April 2006.
At posttest, both intervention groups had significantly increased their total physical activity compared with the control group. At follow-up, the lifestyle group showed significantly larger increases in active transportation and total steps than the control and structured group respectively. There were no longer significant differences between the structured intervention and the control group.
The structured and lifestyle interventions were equally effective at the end of the intervention. One year after the intervention the lifestyle group maintained a significant increase in physical activity, which highlights the potential of lifestyle programs in the battle against inactivity in older adults.
评估生活方式干预和结构化运动干预对老年人身体活动的影响。
参与者被随机分配到生活方式干预组(n = 60),包括一个通过电话支持的个性化居家项目,或结构化干预组(n = 60),该组由每周三次的监督课程组成。结果与对照组(n = 66)进行比较。在开始前(预测试)、结束时(11个月,后测试)和23个月后(随访),使用自我报告问卷、计步器和加速度计测量身体活动。该研究于2004年3月至2006年4月在比利时进行。
在后测试时,与对照组相比,两个干预组的总体身体活动均显著增加。在随访时,生活方式组在主动出行和总步数方面的增加分别显著大于对照组和结构化干预组。结构化干预组与对照组之间不再有显著差异。
在干预结束时,结构化干预和生活方式干预同样有效。干预一年后,生活方式组的身体活动仍显著增加,这突出了生活方式项目在对抗老年人身体活动不足方面的潜力。