Hansen Richard A, Gaynes Bradley N, Gartlehner Gerald, Moore Charity G, Tiwari Ruchi, Lohr Kathleen N
Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):170-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f4224a.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antidepressants in social anxiety disorder. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PsychLit, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from January 1980 through October 2006. Comparative evidence was summarized and indirect comparisons were made using network meta-analysis. Only three head-to-head trials were identified; comparative trials found only minimal differences in efficacy between escitalopram and paroxetine, and no statistically significant differences in efficacy between extended-release venlafaxine and paroxetine. Pooled evidence from 15 placebo-controlled trials suggests that escitalopram [relative benefit (RB) 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5], paroxetine (RB 1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.3), sertraline (RB 1.8; 95% CI 1.5-2.2), and venlafaxine (RB 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-1.9) all produce significantly more responders than placebo; evidence favored fluvoxamine over placebo but was not significant (RB 1.5; 95% CI 0.9-2.4). Network meta-analysis did not reveal differences in efficacy among drugs. Overall, a fair amount of evidence supports the efficacy of escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine in social anxiety disorder. The drugs do not differ in efficacy, although their adverse event profiles do.
开展了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估第二代抗抑郁药治疗社交焦虑障碍的相对疗效和耐受性。通过检索1980年1月至2006年10月期间的MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、PsychLit和国际药学文摘来识别相关研究。对比较证据进行了总结,并使用网状荟萃分析进行间接比较。仅识别出三项直接比较试验;比较试验发现艾司西酞普兰和帕罗西汀之间疗效仅有极小差异,缓释文拉法辛和帕罗西汀之间疗效无统计学显著差异。来自15项安慰剂对照试验的汇总证据表明,艾司西酞普兰[相对获益(RB)1.3;95%置信区间(CI)1.2 - 1.5]、帕罗西汀(RB 1.9;95% CI 1.5 - 2.3)、舍曲林(RB 1.8;95% CI 1.5 - 2.2)和文拉法辛(RB 1.7;95% CI 1.5 - 1.9)产生的有效应答者均显著多于安慰剂;有证据支持氟伏沙明优于安慰剂,但不显著(RB 1.5;95% CI 0.9 - 2.4)。网状荟萃分析未揭示药物之间疗效存在差异。总体而言,大量证据支持艾司西酞普兰、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林和文拉法辛治疗社交焦虑障碍的疗效。这些药物疗效无差异,但其不良事件谱有所不同。