Suppr超能文献

第二代抗抑郁药治疗社交焦虑障碍的疗效与耐受性

Efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antidepressants in social anxiety disorder.

作者信息

Hansen Richard A, Gaynes Bradley N, Gartlehner Gerald, Moore Charity G, Tiwari Ruchi, Lohr Kathleen N

机构信息

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):170-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f4224a.

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antidepressants in social anxiety disorder. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, PsychLit, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from January 1980 through October 2006. Comparative evidence was summarized and indirect comparisons were made using network meta-analysis. Only three head-to-head trials were identified; comparative trials found only minimal differences in efficacy between escitalopram and paroxetine, and no statistically significant differences in efficacy between extended-release venlafaxine and paroxetine. Pooled evidence from 15 placebo-controlled trials suggests that escitalopram [relative benefit (RB) 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-1.5], paroxetine (RB 1.9; 95% CI 1.5-2.3), sertraline (RB 1.8; 95% CI 1.5-2.2), and venlafaxine (RB 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-1.9) all produce significantly more responders than placebo; evidence favored fluvoxamine over placebo but was not significant (RB 1.5; 95% CI 0.9-2.4). Network meta-analysis did not reveal differences in efficacy among drugs. Overall, a fair amount of evidence supports the efficacy of escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, and venlafaxine in social anxiety disorder. The drugs do not differ in efficacy, although their adverse event profiles do.

摘要

开展了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估第二代抗抑郁药治疗社交焦虑障碍的相对疗效和耐受性。通过检索1980年1月至2006年10月期间的MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、PsychLit和国际药学文摘来识别相关研究。对比较证据进行了总结,并使用网状荟萃分析进行间接比较。仅识别出三项直接比较试验;比较试验发现艾司西酞普兰和帕罗西汀之间疗效仅有极小差异,缓释文拉法辛和帕罗西汀之间疗效无统计学显著差异。来自15项安慰剂对照试验的汇总证据表明,艾司西酞普兰[相对获益(RB)1.3;95%置信区间(CI)1.2 - 1.5]、帕罗西汀(RB 1.9;95% CI 1.5 - 2.3)、舍曲林(RB 1.8;95% CI 1.5 - 2.2)和文拉法辛(RB 1.7;95% CI 1.5 - 1.9)产生的有效应答者均显著多于安慰剂;有证据支持氟伏沙明优于安慰剂,但不显著(RB 1.5;95% CI 0.9 - 2.4)。网状荟萃分析未揭示药物之间疗效存在差异。总体而言,大量证据支持艾司西酞普兰、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林和文拉法辛治疗社交焦虑障碍的疗效。这些药物疗效无差异,但其不良事件谱有所不同。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of second-generation antidepressants in social anxiety disorder.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 May;23(3):170-9. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f4224a.
2
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
3
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
7
Antidepressants for the treatment of people with co-occurring depression and alcohol dependence.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 24;4(4):CD008581. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008581.pub2.
8
Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 14;9(9):CD013206. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013206.pub2.
9
[Clinical efficacy and achievement of a complete remission in depression: increasing interest in treatment with escitalopram].
Encephale. 2012 Feb;38(1):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
10
Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD004185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004185.pub2.

引用本文的文献

2
Review of EEG, ERP, and Brain Connectivity Estimators as Predictive Biomarkers of Social Anxiety Disorder.
Front Psychol. 2020 May 19;11:730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00730. eCollection 2020.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine in adults with social anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(28):e11547. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011547.
5
A systematic review of network meta-analyses for pharmacological treatment of common mental disorders.
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 Feb;21(1):7-11. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102718. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
6
Inhibition of Efavirenz Metabolism by Sertraline and Nortriptyline and Their Effect on Efavirenz Plasma Concentrations.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec 7;60(2):1022-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02129-15. Print 2016 Feb.
7
The Effects of the Urban Built Environment on Mental Health: A Cohort Study in a Large Northern Italian City.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 20;12(11):14898-915. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114898.
8
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for social anxiety disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;1(5):368-76. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70329-3. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
10
Second-generation antidepressants in social anxiety disorder: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 May;215(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2113-3. Epub 2010 Dec 22.

本文引用的文献

3
Efficacy and safety of second-generation antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 20;143(6):415-26. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00006.
4
Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9260.
5
6
Size and burden of social phobia in Europe.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Aug;15(4):453-62. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.04.002.
7
Social anxiety disorder : current treatment recommendations.
CNS Drugs. 2005;19(5):377-91. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200519050-00002.
9
Venlafaxine extended release vs placebo and paroxetine in social anxiety disorder.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;62(2):190-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.2.190.
10
Evidence of evidence-based health policy: the politics of systematic reviews in coverage decisions.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Feb;24(1):114-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.1.114.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验