Heilbron Johan, Guilhot Nicolas, Jeanpierre Laurent
Centre de sociologie européenne, Paris.
J Hist Behav Sci. 2008 Spring;44(2):146-60. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.20302.
Historical accounts of the social sciences have too often accepted local or national institutions as a self-evident framework of analysis, instead of considering them as being embedded in transnational relations of various kinds. Evolving patterns of transnational mobility and exchange cut through the neat distinction between the local, the national, and the inter-national, and thus represent an essential component in the dynamics of the social sciences, as well as a fruitful perspective for rethinking their historical development. In this programmatic outline, it is argued that a transnational history of the social sciences may be fruitfully understood on the basis of three general mechanisms, which have structured the transnational flows of people and ideas in decisive ways: (a) the functioning of international scholarly institutions, (b) the transnational mobility of scholars, and (c) the politics of trans-national exchange of nonacademic institutions. The article subsequently examines and illustrates each of these mechanisms.
社会科学的历史记述常常将地方或国家机构视为不言而喻的分析框架,而不是将其视为嵌入在各种跨国关系之中。跨国流动和交流模式的不断演变打破了地方、国家和国际之间的清晰界限,因此,它不仅是社会科学动态发展的一个重要组成部分,也是重新思考其历史发展的一个富有成效的视角。在这个纲领性概述中,有人认为,可以基于三种一般机制来富有成效地理解社会科学的跨国历史,这三种机制以决定性方式构建了人员和思想的跨国流动:(a)国际学术机构的运作;(b)学者的跨国流动;(c)非学术机构跨国交流的政治因素。本文随后将对这些机制逐一进行考察和阐释。