Brown Jennifer L, Vanable Peter A, Eriksen Michael D
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244-2340, USA.
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Feb;40(1):1-7. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.1.1.
Computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) questionnaires are being used with increased frequency to deliver surveys that previously were administered via self-administeredpaper-and-pencil questionnaires (SAQs). Although CASI may offer a number of advantages, an important consideration for researchers is the assessment modality's immediate and long-term costs. To facilitate researchers' choice between CASI and SAQ, this article provides theoretical cost models with specific parameters for comparing the costs for each assessment type. Utilizing these cost models, this study compared the cost effectiveness in a health behavior study in which both CASI (n = 100) and SAQ (n = 100) questionnaires were administered. Given the high initial costs, CASI was found to be less cost effective than SAQ for a single study. However, for studies with large sample sizes or when CASI software is to be used for multiple studies, CASI would be more cost effective and should be the assessment mode of choice.
计算机辅助自我访谈(CASI)问卷正越来越频繁地用于开展调查,这些调查以前是通过自行填写的纸笔问卷(SAQ)进行的。尽管CASI可能具有许多优势,但研究人员的一个重要考虑因素是评估方式的直接成本和长期成本。为了便于研究人员在CASI和SAQ之间做出选择,本文提供了具有特定参数的理论成本模型,用于比较每种评估类型的成本。利用这些成本模型,本研究比较了一项健康行为研究中的成本效益,该研究中同时使用了CASI(n = 100)和SAQ(n = 100)问卷。鉴于初始成本较高,在单一研究中,发现CASI的成本效益不如SAQ。然而,对于大样本量的研究或当CASI软件要用于多项研究时,CASI将更具成本效益,应该是首选的评估模式。