Suppr超能文献

用于自我管理问卷中与模式无关测量的视觉模拟量表。

Visual analogue scales for mode-independent measurement in self-administered questionnaires.

作者信息

Gerich Joacuim

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2007 Nov;39(4):985-92. doi: 10.3758/bf03192994.

Abstract

Previous research has shown evidence for mode differences between computer-assisted self-administered interviews (CASI) and paper-and-pencil interviews, especially in the case of sensitive questions. Some of these differences are explained by higher degrees of self-disclosure for CASI than for paper-and-pencil interviews, due to the more private situation with CASIs. This analysis examines the existence of different degrees of self-disclosure for CASI versus paper-and-pencil questionnaires and whether these differences can be reduced by the use of a specific response format. Judgments of items on a self-control scale with discrete 5-point (Likert-type) scales are compared with judgments on continuous visual analogue scales (VAS). Because a categorization effect for Likert-type items is assumed when pressure for social desirability is present, it is hypothesized that VAS compared to Likert-type response formats are less sensitive to mode differences.

摘要

先前的研究已证明计算机辅助自填式访谈(CASI)和纸笔访谈之间存在方式差异,尤其是在涉及敏感问题的情况下。其中一些差异可以解释为,由于CASI的环境更私密,其自我披露程度高于纸笔访谈。本分析考察了CASI与纸笔问卷在自我披露程度上是否存在差异,以及使用特定的回答格式是否可以减少这些差异。将采用离散5分制(李克特式)量表对自我控制量表项目的判断与采用连续视觉模拟量表(VAS)的判断进行比较。由于假定在存在社会期望压力时李克特式项目存在分类效应,因此假设与李克特式回答格式相比,VAS对方式差异的敏感度较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验