Chase J Geoffrey, Shaw Geoffrey, Le Compte Aaron, Lonergan Timothy, Willacy Michael, Wong Xing-Wei, Lin Jessica, Lotz Thomas, Lee Dominic, Hann Christopher
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Clyde Road, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R49. doi: 10.1186/cc6868. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
Stress-induced hyperglycaemia is prevalent in critical care. Control of blood glucose levels to within a 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L range or below 7.75 mmol/L can reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes. The Specialised Relative Insulin Nutrition Tables (SPRINT) protocol is a simple wheel-based system that modulates insulin and nutritional inputs for tight glycaemic control.
SPRINT was implemented as a clinical practice change in a general intensive care unit (ICU). The objective of this study was to measure the effect of the SPRINT protocol on glycaemic control and mortality compared with previous ICU control methods. Glycaemic control and mortality outcomes for 371 SPRINT patients with a median Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of 18 (interquartile range [IQR] 15 to 24) are compared with a 413-patient retrospective cohort with a median APACHE II score of 18 (IQR 15 to 23).
Overall, 53.9% of all measurements were in the 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L band. Blood glucose concentrations were found to be log-normal and thus log-normal statistics are used throughout to describe the data. The average log-normal glycaemia was 6.0 mmol/L (standard deviation 1.5 mmol/L). Only 9.0% of all measurements were below 4.4 mmol/L, with 3.8% below 4 mmol/L and 0.1% of measurements below 2.2 mmol/L. On SPRINT, 80% more measurements were in the 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L band and standard deviation of blood glucose was 38% lower compared with the retrospective control. The range and peak of blood glucose were not correlated with mortality for SPRINT patients (P >0.30). For ICU length of stay (LoS) of greater than or equal to 3 days, hospital mortality was reduced from 34.1% to 25.4% (-26%) (P = 0.05). For ICU LoS of greater than or equal to 4 days, hospital mortality was reduced from 34.3% to 23.5% (-32%) (P = 0.02). For ICU LoS of greater than or equal to 5 days, hospital mortality was reduced from 31.9% to 20.6% (-35%) (P = 0.02). ICU mortality was also reduced but the P value was less than 0.13 for ICU LoS of greater than or equal to 4 and 5 days.
SPRINT achieved a high level of glycaemic control on a severely ill critical cohort population. Reductions in mortality were observed compared with a retrospective hyperglycaemic cohort. Range and peak blood glucose metrics were no longer correlated with mortality outcome under SPRINT.
应激性高血糖在重症监护中很常见。将血糖水平控制在4.4至6.1毫摩尔/升范围内或低于7.75毫摩尔/升可降低死亡率并改善临床结局。专门的相对胰岛素营养表(SPRINT)方案是一种基于轮盘的简单系统,可调节胰岛素和营养输入以实现严格的血糖控制。
SPRINT作为一项临床实践变革在一家综合性重症监护病房(ICU)实施。本研究的目的是测量SPRINT方案与之前的ICU控制方法相比对血糖控制和死亡率的影响。将371例急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分中位数为18(四分位间距[IQR]15至24)的SPRINT患者的血糖控制和死亡率结果与413例APACHE II评分中位数为18(IQR 15至23)的患者的回顾性队列进行比较。
总体而言,所有测量值的53.9%处于4.4至6.1毫摩尔/升区间。发现血糖浓度呈对数正态分布,因此在整个过程中使用对数正态统计来描述数据。平均对数正态血糖为6.0毫摩尔/升(标准差1.5毫摩尔/升)。所有测量值中只有9.0%低于4.4毫摩尔/升,3.8%低于4毫摩尔/升,0.1%的测量值低于2.2毫摩尔/升。与回顾性对照组相比,采用SPRINT方案时,处于4.4至6.1毫摩尔/升区间的测量值多80%,血糖标准差降低38%。SPRINT患者的血糖范围和峰值与死亡率无关(P>0.30)。对于重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LoS)大于或等于3天的患者,医院死亡率从34.1%降至25.4%(-26%)(P = 0.05)。对于ICU LoS大于或等于4天的患者,医院死亡率从34.3%降至23.5%(-32%)(P = 0.02)。对于ICU LoS大于或等于5天的患者,医院死亡率从31.9%降至20.6%(-35%)(P = 0.02)。ICU死亡率也有所降低,但对于ICU LoS大于或等于4天和5天而言,P值小于0.13。
SPRINT在重症危重病患者群体中实现了高水平的血糖控制。与回顾性高血糖队列相比,死亡率有所降低。在SPRINT方案下,血糖范围和峰值指标与死亡率结果不再相关。