Dryden M W, Payne P A, McBride A, Mailen S, Smith V, Carithers D
Kansas State University.
Vet Ther. 2008 Spring;9(1):15-25.
This study evaluated overall efficacy, percentage of dogs free of live ticks, retention of ticks, and efficacy against retained ticks of fipronil (9.8% w/w) + (S)-methoprene (8.8% w/w) and imidacloprid (8.8% w/w) + permethrin (44% w/w) spot-on topical solutions against Dermacentor variabilis-infested dogs. Tick control was significantly greater (P < .05) on dogs treated with fipronil + (S)-methoprene than on control dogs for the entire 30-day study period. Conversely, the combination product of imidacloprid + permethrin demonstrated activity significantly (P < .05) different from that seen on control dogs only up to day 23. Significantly (P < .05) more dogs treated with fipronil + (S)-methoprene were free of live ticks compared with controls on days 3, 9, and 16. There was never a significant difference (P > .05) between control and imidacloprid + permethrin-treated dogs in numbers of dogs free of live ticks. After the initial 10-minute tick exposure, lower numbers of ticks were retained on the imidacloprid + permethrin-treated dogs than on the fipronil + (S)-methoprene-treated dogs. However, when evaluating the effectiveness of the acaricides on "retained ticks," it appears that while some of the ticks were rapidly knocked down on the imidacloprid + permethrin-treated dogs, efficacy against ticks still retained at 10 minutes was never greater than 50%.
本研究评估了氟虫腈(9.8% w/w)+(S)-烯虫酯(8.8% w/w)和吡虫啉(8.8% w/w)+氯菊酯(44% w/w)的点滴型局部用溶液对感染变异革蜱的犬的总体疗效、无活蜱犬的百分比、蜱的留存情况以及对留存蜱的疗效。在整个30天的研究期内,用氟虫腈+(S)-烯虫酯治疗的犬的蜱控制效果显著优于对照犬(P < 0.05)。相反,吡虫啉+氯菊酯的复方产品仅在第23天之前显示出与对照犬显著不同(P < 0.05)的活性。在第3天、第9天和第16天,与对照犬相比,用氟虫腈+(S)-烯虫酯治疗的无活蜱犬显著更多(P < 0.05)。在无活蜱犬数量方面,对照犬和用吡虫啉+氯菊酯治疗的犬之间从未有显著差异(P > 0.05)。在最初10分钟蜱暴露后,用吡虫啉+氯菊酯治疗的犬身上留存的蜱数量比用氟虫腈+(S)-烯虫酯治疗的犬少。然而,在评估杀螨剂对“留存蜱”的有效性时,虽然在吡虫啉+氯菊酯治疗的犬身上一些蜱被迅速击倒,但在10分钟时对仍留存的蜱的疗效从未超过50%。