Metcalf Kasey, Langdon Robyn, Coltheart Max
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;24(1):23-47. doi: 10.1080/02643290600694901.
Confabulation can be defined as statements or actions that involve distortions of memories. This paper reviews current theories of confabulation focusing on source monitoring, temporal-context, and retrieval theories. The attributes and criticisms of these three models are discussed. From this review, a three-factor cognitive-neuropsychological framework is proposed, which can be used to explain the variable symptoms of confabulation. The framework takes its basis from the Langdon and Coltheart (2000a, 2000b) cognitive model of delusional belief formation. The model suggests that two deficits are likely in most cases of confabulation - an executive control retrieval deficit and an evaluation deficit. It also takes into consideration how the general organization of the autobiographical memory store and a person's individual emotional/motivational biases can influence confabulatory symptoms and content. This is an overarching framework that can be used to model confabulations, and it builds upon links between delusions and confabulation.
虚构可被定义为涉及记忆扭曲的陈述或行为。本文回顾了当前关于虚构的理论,重点关注源监测、时间背景和检索理论。讨论了这三种模型的特点和批评意见。通过这一综述,提出了一个三因素认知神经心理学框架,可用于解释虚构的各种症状。该框架基于兰登和科尔瑟特(2000a,2000b)的妄想信念形成认知模型。该模型表明,在大多数虚构病例中可能存在两种缺陷——执行控制检索缺陷和评估缺陷。它还考虑了自传体记忆存储的总体组织以及一个人的个人情感/动机偏差如何影响虚构症状和内容。这是一个可用于对虚构进行建模的总体框架,它建立在妄想与虚构之间的联系之上。