Suppr超能文献

虚构症模型:批判性综述与新框架

Models of confabulation: a critical review and a new framework.

作者信息

Metcalf Kasey, Langdon Robyn, Coltheart Max

机构信息

Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;24(1):23-47. doi: 10.1080/02643290600694901.

Abstract

Confabulation can be defined as statements or actions that involve distortions of memories. This paper reviews current theories of confabulation focusing on source monitoring, temporal-context, and retrieval theories. The attributes and criticisms of these three models are discussed. From this review, a three-factor cognitive-neuropsychological framework is proposed, which can be used to explain the variable symptoms of confabulation. The framework takes its basis from the Langdon and Coltheart (2000a, 2000b) cognitive model of delusional belief formation. The model suggests that two deficits are likely in most cases of confabulation - an executive control retrieval deficit and an evaluation deficit. It also takes into consideration how the general organization of the autobiographical memory store and a person's individual emotional/motivational biases can influence confabulatory symptoms and content. This is an overarching framework that can be used to model confabulations, and it builds upon links between delusions and confabulation.

摘要

虚构可被定义为涉及记忆扭曲的陈述或行为。本文回顾了当前关于虚构的理论,重点关注源监测、时间背景和检索理论。讨论了这三种模型的特点和批评意见。通过这一综述,提出了一个三因素认知神经心理学框架,可用于解释虚构的各种症状。该框架基于兰登和科尔瑟特(2000a,2000b)的妄想信念形成认知模型。该模型表明,在大多数虚构病例中可能存在两种缺陷——执行控制检索缺陷和评估缺陷。它还考虑了自传体记忆存储的总体组织以及一个人的个人情感/动机偏差如何影响虚构症状和内容。这是一个可用于对虚构进行建模的总体框架,它建立在妄想与虚构之间的联系之上。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验