Schumann Anja, John Ulrich, Ulbricht Sabina, Rüge Jeannette, Bischof Gallus, Meyer Christian
University Leipzig, Coordination Center for Clinical Trials Leipzig KKSL, Härtelstr. Leipzig, Germany.
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Nov;77(11):715-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
This study examines tailored feedback letters of a smoking cessation intervention that is conceptually based on the transtheoretical model, from a content-based perspective.
Data of 2 population-based intervention studies, both randomized controlled trials, with total N=1044 were used. The procedure of the intervention, the tailoring principle for the feedback letters, and the content of the intervention materials are described in detail. Theoretical and empirical frequencies of unique feedback letters are presented.
The intervention system was able to generate a total of 1040 unique letters with normative feedback only, and almost half a million unique letters with normative and ipsative feedback. Almost every single smoker in contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance had an empirically unique combination of tailoring variables and received a unique letter. In contrast, many smokers in precontemplation shared a combination of tailoring variables and received identical letters.
The transtheoretical model provides an enormous theoretical and empirical variability of tailoring. However, tailoring for a major subgroup of smokers, i.e. those who do not intend to quit, needs improvement. Conceptual ideas for additional tailoring variables are discussed.
本研究从基于内容的视角,审视一种基于跨理论模型的戒烟干预的个性化反馈信。
使用了两项基于人群的干预研究的数据,均为随机对照试验,总样本量N = 1044。详细描述了干预程序、反馈信的个性化原则以及干预材料的内容。呈现了独特反馈信的理论和实证频率。
干预系统仅能生成总共1040封仅带有规范性反馈的独特信件,以及近50万封带有规范性和自比性反馈的独特信件。几乎每个处于思考、准备、行动和维持阶段的吸烟者都有个性化变量的实证独特组合,并收到了独特的信件。相比之下,许多处于前思考阶段的吸烟者共享个性化变量组合并收到相同的信件。
跨理论模型提供了巨大的个性化理论和实证变异性。然而,针对主要吸烟者亚组,即那些不打算戒烟的人,个性化需要改进。讨论了关于额外个性化变量的概念性想法。