Department of Family and Community Medicine, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jan;90(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.017. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
Tailoring to psychological constructs (e.g. self-efficacy, readiness) motivates behavior change, but whether knowledge tailoring alone changes healthcare preferences--a precursor of behavior change in some studies--is unknown. We examined this issue in secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial of a tailored colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intervention, stratified by ethnicity/language subgroups (Hispanic/Spanish, Hispanic/English, non-Hispanic/English).
Logistic regressions compared effects of a CRC screening knowledge-tailored intervention versus a non-tailored control on preferences for specific test options (fecal occult blood or colonoscopy), in the entire sample (N=1164) and the three ethnicity/language subgroups.
Pre-intervention, preferences for specific tests did not differ significantly between study groups (experimental, 64.5%; control 62.6%). Post-intervention, more experimental participants (78.6%) than control participants (67.7%) preferred specific tests (P<0.001). Adjusting for pre-intervention preferences, more experimental group participants than control group participants preferred specific tests post-intervention [average marginal effect (AME)=9.5%, 95% CI 5.3-13.6; P<0.001]. AMEs were similar across ethnicity/language subgroups.
Knowledge tailoring increased preferences for specific CRC screening tests across ethnic and language groups.
If the observed preference changes are found to translate into behavior changes, then knowledge tailoring alone may enhance healthy behaviors.
针对心理结构(如自我效能感、准备度)进行定制可以激发行为改变,但知识定制本身是否会改变医疗偏好(在某些研究中是行为改变的前兆)尚不清楚。我们在一项针对定制结直肠癌(CRC)筛查干预措施的随机对照试验的二次分析中检验了这个问题,该试验按种族/语言亚组(西班牙裔/西班牙语、西班牙裔/英语、非西班牙裔/英语)进行分层。
逻辑回归比较了 CRC 筛查知识定制干预与非定制对照对特定测试选项(粪便潜血或结肠镜检查)偏好的影响,在整个样本(N=1164)和三个种族/语言亚组中进行比较。
干预前,研究组之间对特定测试的偏好没有显著差异(实验组 64.5%;对照组 62.6%)。干预后,实验组(78.6%)比对照组(67.7%)更喜欢特定的测试(P<0.001)。调整干预前的偏好后,实验组参与者比对照组参与者更喜欢特定的测试[平均边际效应(AME)=9.5%,95%置信区间 5.3-13.6;P<0.001]。AME 在不同种族/语言亚组中相似。
知识定制增加了对特定 CRC 筛查测试的偏好,跨越了种族和语言群体。
如果观察到的偏好变化被发现可以转化为行为改变,那么仅仅是知识定制就可以增强健康行为。