Chung-Park Min
Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, Box 555191, Camp Pendleton, CA 92055, USA.
Mil Med. 2008 Mar;173(3):305-12. doi: 10.7205/milmed.173.3.305.
The safety and efficacy of postcoital administration of oral contraceptives, commonly called "emergency contraception pills" (ECPs), have been well documented; nonetheless, this method of preventing pregnancy is underused in the United States. Through the use of surveys, the current study assessed providers' knowledge, prescribing practices, attitudes, and barriers regarding ECPs at a military treatment facility in the southwest United States. Results showed a lack of knowledge of ECP provision, with 34% believing treatment had to be initiated in 48 or fewer hours, and 60% believing two doses must be taken within 24 hours or more of each other. Slightly more than one- half (54.4%) of the providers reported having prescribed an ECP; those who had prescribed had more positive attitudes about ECPs. Perceived barriers included women not asking for ECPs, concerns about safety of ECPs, and issues regarding liability. A discrepancy between providers' perceived and actual knowledge about ECPs supports the need for better education for all providers who care for women.
性交后口服避孕药,通常称为“紧急避孕药”(ECP)的安全性和有效性已有充分记录;尽管如此,这种预防怀孕的方法在美国并未得到充分利用。通过调查,本研究评估了美国西南部一家军事治疗机构的医护人员关于紧急避孕药的知识、处方习惯、态度及障碍。结果显示,医护人员对紧急避孕药的提供缺乏了解,34%的人认为必须在48小时或更短时间内开始治疗,60%的人认为必须在彼此24小时或更长时间内服用两剂。略多于一半(54.4%)的医护人员报告曾开过紧急避孕药;开过药的人对紧急避孕药的态度更为积极。感知到的障碍包括女性未索要紧急避孕药、对紧急避孕药安全性的担忧以及责任问题。医护人员对紧急避孕药的感知知识与实际知识之间的差异表明,需要对所有护理女性的医护人员进行更好的教育。