Suppr超能文献

有效的医学教育:来自考科蓝图书馆的见解

Effective medical education: insights from the Cochrane Library.

作者信息

Satterlee Winston G, Eggers Robin G, Grimes David A

机构信息

Medical Affairs, Avant Healthcare Marketing, Carmel, Indiana 46032, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008 May;63(5):329-33. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e31816ff661.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In 2006, the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education highlighted the need for linking educational activities to changes in competence, performance, or patient outcomes. Hence, educational providers increasingly need to know what strategies are effective. The Cochrane Library is widely regarded as the best source of credible evidence concerning health care. The authors searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (issue 4 for 2006) using the search terms "continuing medical education," "medical education," and "continuing education." They conducted a second complementary search of this database by review group (Effective Practice and Organization of Care). Finally, the authors examined the references of recent review articles for Cochrane reviews and found 9 relevant reviews. The most effective educational methods were the most interactive. Combined didactic presentations and workshops were more effective than traditional didactic presentations alone. Medical education was more effective when more than 1 intervention occurred, especially if these interventions occurred over an extended period. Targeted education should focus on changing a behavior that is simple, because effect size is inversely proportional to the complexity of the behavior. In the era of evidence-based medicine, interventions-including educational ones-should reflect the best available evidence. Cochrane reviews of randomized controlled trials of educational methods provide important guidance that often challenges traditional didactic approaches. Integrating the findings from the Cochrane reviews may allow continuing medical education to be more successful in bringing about changes to healthcare providers' behavior.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to explain the scientific evidence concerning the effectiveness of various techniques used for continuing medical education, state the relative value of such techniques as traditional didactic lectures, conferences led by local opinion leaders, interactive workshops, and educational outreach visits, and identify the value and limitations of teaching critical appraisal skills.

摘要

未标注

2006年,继续医学教育认证委员会强调有必要将教育活动与能力、表现或患者预后的变化联系起来。因此,教育提供者越来越需要了解哪些策略是有效的。《考科蓝图书馆》被广泛认为是有关医疗保健的可靠证据的最佳来源。作者使用检索词“继续医学教育”、“医学教育”和“继续教育”检索了考科蓝系统评价数据库(2006年第4期)。他们通过评价组(有效实践与医疗组织)对该数据库进行了第二次补充检索。最后,作者查阅了考科蓝系统评价近期综述文章的参考文献,发现了9篇相关综述。最有效的教育方法是互动性最强的方法。讲授与研讨会相结合比单纯的传统讲授更有效。当进行不止一项干预措施时,医学教育更有效,尤其是如果这些干预措施持续较长时间。针对性教育应侧重于改变简单的行为,因为效应量与行为的复杂性成反比。在循证医学时代,干预措施(包括教育干预)应反映现有最佳证据。考科蓝对教育方法随机对照试验的综述提供了重要指导,这些指导常常对传统讲授方法提出挑战。整合考科蓝综述的研究结果可能会使继续医学教育在促使医疗保健提供者行为改变方面更成功。

目标受众

妇产科医生、家庭医生。

学习目标

阅读本文后,读者应能够解释有关继续医学教育中使用的各种技术有效性的科学证据,说明传统讲授讲座、由当地意见领袖主持的会议、互动研讨会和教育外展访问等技术的相对价值,并确定批判性评估技能教学的价值和局限性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验