van der Meer P F
Sanquin Blood Bank North West region, Plesmanlaan 125, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Transfus Clin Biol. 2007 Dec;14(6):522-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
Platelet additive solutions (PASs) were first developed in the 1980s, and continued to be improved over the following years. The use of PASs as replacement for plasma has a number of benefits, both for the quality of the platelet concentrates and for the patients. However, some PASs have been associated with a lower platelet yield in the PCs, a shorter storage time, and a lower increment in the patient when compared to PCs in plasma. A number of reformulations of the PASs have taken place to counteract these disadvantages. Most PASs use acetate as nutrient for the platelets, which has the benefit of generating bicarbonate when oxidized by the platelets, thus supplying its own buffering capacity. Alternatively, glucose is used, but may cause deterioration of pH in the stored PCs due to the formation of lactic acid. Addition of other buffering substances, such as phosphate, can be added to ensure maintenance of neutral pH. An important finding was the inhibiting effect of potassium and magnesium on platelet activation. The initially developed PASs lacked these two ingredients and showed reduced storage times of the PCs in PAS when compared to those stored in plasma. However, when these constituents are included in the PAS, storage time is similar and even exceeds those seen for PCs in plasma. Considerable research is done in further formulating the optimal PAS. Bicarbonate is being considered as buffer for these PASs. Also, L-carnitine appears to have a favorable effect on stored platelets, including a reduction of platelet metabolism, and inhibition of apoptosis. Another area of optimization is lowering of plasma content needed for maintaining platelet quality. Where current PASs still need at least 30% residual plasma, there is a trend towards lowering the plasma content to less than 5% with the newer PASs. Preservation of purinergic platelet receptor functionality by ADP-degrading activities in plasma appears to play an important role in this respect. Development of PASs are usually based on in vitro studies alone. It is important to realize that only clinical studies can give definitive answers about the quality of platelets stored in PASs. Sofar, only limited clinical evaluations have been published that either studied the effectiveness of platelets in initially-developed PASs, or were specifically done in combination with pathogen reduction technologies. Thus, PASs seem to be an excellent replacement for (part of) the plasma when producing PCs, and allow extended storage with maintenance of quality, but more clinical studies are needed to substantiate in vitro results.
血小板添加剂溶液(PASs)最早于20世纪80年代研发出来,并在随后的几年里不断改进。使用PASs替代血浆,对血小板浓缩物的质量和患者都有诸多益处。然而,与血浆中的血小板浓缩物相比,一些PASs与血小板浓缩物中较低的血小板产量、较短的储存时间以及患者体内较低的血小板增加量有关。为了抵消这些缺点,人们对PASs进行了多次重新配方。大多数PASs使用醋酸盐作为血小板的营养物质,其好处是当被血小板氧化时会生成碳酸氢盐,从而提供自身的缓冲能力。另外,也会使用葡萄糖,但由于乳酸的形成,可能会导致储存的血小板浓缩物的pH值恶化。可以添加其他缓冲物质,如磷酸盐,以确保维持中性pH值。一个重要的发现是钾和镁对血小板活化有抑制作用。最初研发的PASs缺乏这两种成分,与储存在血浆中的血小板浓缩物相比,其在PAS中的储存时间缩短。然而,当这些成分包含在PAS中时,储存时间相似,甚至超过了血浆中血小板浓缩物的储存时间。在进一步制定最佳PAS方面进行了大量研究。碳酸氢盐正被考虑作为这些PASs的缓冲剂。此外,左旋肉碱似乎对储存的血小板有有利影响,包括减少血小板代谢和抑制细胞凋亡。另一个优化领域是降低维持血小板质量所需的血浆含量。目前的PASs仍至少需要30%的残余血浆,但随着新型PASs的出现,有将血浆含量降低至5%以下的趋势。血浆中ADP降解活性对嘌呤能血小板受体功能的保存似乎在这方面起着重要作用。PASs的研发通常仅基于体外研究。必须认识到,只有临床研究才能对储存在PASs中的血小板质量给出明确答案。到目前为止,仅发表了有限的临床评估,要么研究了最初研发的PASs中血小板的有效性,要么是专门结合病原体灭活技术进行的。因此,在生产血小板浓缩物时,PASs似乎是(部分)血浆的极佳替代品,并能在维持质量不变的情况下延长储存时间,但需要更多的临床研究来证实体外研究结果。