Simon Judit, Gray Alastair, Clarke Philip, Wade Alisha, Neil Andrew, Farmer Andrew
Health Economics Research Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF.
BMJ. 2008 May 24;336(7654):1177-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39526.674873.BE. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
To assess the cost effectiveness of self monitoring of blood glucose alone or with additional training in incorporating the results into self care, in addition to standardised usual care for patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes.
Incremental cost utility analysis from a healthcare perspective. Data on resource use from the randomised controlled diabetes glycaemic education and monitoring (DiGEM) trial covered 12 months before baseline and 12 months of trial follow-up. Quality of life was measured at baseline and 12 months using the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire.
Primary care in the United Kingdom.
453 patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes.
Standardised usual care (control) compared with additional self monitoring of blood glucose alone (less intensive self monitoring) or with training in self interpretation of the results (more intensive self monitoring).
Quality adjusted life years and healthcare costs (sterling in 2005-6 prices).
The average costs of intervention were pound89 (euro113; $179) for standardised usual care, pound181 for less intensive self monitoring, and pound173 for more intensive self monitoring, showing an additional cost per patient of pound92 (95% confidence interval pound80 to pound103) in the less intensive group and pound84 ( pound73 to pound96) in the more intensive group. No other significant cost difference was detected between the groups. An initial negative impact of self monitoring on quality of life occurred, averaging -0.027 (95% confidence interval-0.069 to 0.015) for the less intensive self monitoring group and -0.075 (-0.119 to -0.031) for the more intensive group.
Self monitoring of blood glucose with or without additional training in incorporating the results into self care was associated with higher costs and lower quality of life in patients with non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes. In light of this, and no clinically significant differences in other outcomes, self monitoring of blood glucose is unlikely to be cost effective in addition to standardised usual care.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47464659.
评估单纯自我血糖监测,或在将结果纳入自我护理方面接受额外培训并结合标准化常规护理,对非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的成本效益。
从医疗保健角度进行增量成本效用分析。随机对照糖尿病血糖教育与监测(DiGEM)试验中的资源使用数据涵盖基线前12个月和试验随访的12个月。使用欧洲五维度健康量表(EuroQol EQ-5D)问卷在基线和12个月时测量生活质量。
英国的初级医疗保健机构。
453例非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者。
标准化常规护理(对照组)与单纯额外自我血糖监测(强度较低的自我监测)或结果自我解读培训(强度较高的自我监测)进行比较。
质量调整生命年和医疗保健成本(2005 - 2006年价格的英镑)。
标准化常规护理的平均干预成本为89英镑(113欧元;179美元),强度较低的自我监测为181英镑,强度较高的自我监测为173英镑。强度较低组每位患者的额外成本为92英镑(95%置信区间80英镑至103英镑),强度较高组为84英镑(73英镑至96英镑)。两组之间未检测到其他显著的成本差异。自我监测对生活质量产生了初始负面影响,强度较低的自我监测组平均为 -0.027(95%置信区间 -0.069至0.015),强度较高组为 -0.075(-0.119至 -0.031)。
对于非胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者,无论是否在将结果纳入自我护理方面接受额外培训,自我血糖监测都与更高的成本和更低的生活质量相关。鉴于此,且在其他结果方面无临床显著差异,除标准化常规护理外,自我血糖监测不太可能具有成本效益。
当前受控试验ISRCTN47464659 。