Farmer Andrew, Wade Alisha, French David P, Goyder Elizabeth, Kinmonth Ann Louise, Neil Andrew
Department of Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
BMC Fam Pract. 2005 Jun 16;6:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-25.
We do not yet know how to use blood glucose self-monitoring (BGSM) most effectively in the self-management of type 2 diabetes treated with oral medication. Training in monitoring may be most effective in improving glycaemic control and well being when results are linked to behavioural change.
METHODS/DESIGN: DiGEM is a three arm randomised parallel group trial set in UK general practices. A total of 450 patients with type 2 diabetes managed with lifestyle or oral glucose lowering medication are included. The trial compares effectiveness of three strategies for monitoring glycaemic control over 12 months (1) a control group with three monthly HbA1c measurements; interpreted with nurse-practitioner; (2) A self-testing of blood glucose group; interpreted with nurse- practitioner to inform adjustment of medication in addition to 1; (3) A self-monitoring of blood glucose group with personal use of results to interpret results in relation to lifestyle changes in addition to 1 and 2. The trial has an 80% power at a 5% level of significance to detect a difference in change in the primary outcome, HbA1c of 0.5% between groups, allowing for an attrition rate of 10%. Secondary outcome measures include health service costs, well-being, and the intervention effect in sub-groups defined by duration of diabetes, current management, health status at baseline and co-morbidity. A mediation analysis will explore the extent to which changes in beliefs about self-management of diabetes between experimental groups leads to changes in outcomes in accordance with the Common Sense Model of illness. The study is open and has recruited more than half the target sample. The trial is expected to report in 2007.
The DiGEM intervention and trial design address weaknesses of previous research by use of a sample size with power to detect a clinically significant change in HbA1c, recruitment from a well-characterised primary care population, definition of feasible monitoring and behaviour change strategies based on psychological theory and evidence, and measures along the hypothesised causal path from cognitions to behaviours and disease and well being related outcomes. The trial will provide evidence to support, focus or discourage use of specific BGSM strategies.
我们尚不知道如何在口服药物治疗的2型糖尿病自我管理中最有效地使用血糖自我监测(BGSM)。当监测结果与行为改变相关联时,监测培训可能对改善血糖控制和健康状况最为有效。
方法/设计:DiGEM是一项在英国全科医疗中进行的三臂随机平行组试验。共纳入450例通过生活方式或口服降糖药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者。该试验比较了三种监测血糖控制12个月的策略的有效性:(1)对照组,每三个月测量一次糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),由执业护士解读结果;(2)血糖自我检测组,除上述第(1)项外,由执业护士解读结果以指导药物调整;(3)血糖自我监测组,除上述第(1)项和第(2)项外,患者个人利用结果解读与生活方式改变相关的结果。该试验在5%的显著性水平上有80%的把握度检测组间主要结局糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)变化0.5%的差异,允许10%的损耗率。次要结局指标包括卫生服务成本、健康状况,以及按糖尿病病程、当前治疗、基线健康状况和合并症定义的亚组中的干预效果。一项中介分析将探讨实验组之间关于糖尿病自我管理信念的变化在多大程度上根据疾病常识模型导致结局的变化。该研究为开放性研究,已招募了超过一半的目标样本。该试验预计于2007年报告结果。
DiGEM干预和试验设计通过以下方式解决了以往研究的不足:使用有把握度检测HbA1c临床显著变化的样本量,从特征明确的基层医疗人群中招募,基于心理学理论和证据定义可行的监测和行为改变策略,以及沿着从认知到行为、疾病和健康相关结局的假设因果路径进行测量。该试验将为支持、关注或不鼓励使用特定的BGSM策略提供证据。