Suetta Charlotte, Andersen Jesper L, Dalgas Ulrik, Berget Jakob, Koskinen Satu, Aagaard Per, Magnusson S Peter, Kjaer Michael
Institute of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Jul;105(1):180-6. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01354.2007. Epub 2008 Apr 17.
Although the negative effects of bed rest on muscle strength and muscle mass are well established, it still remains a challenge to identify effective methods to restore physical capacity of elderly patients recovering from hospitalization. The present study compared different training regimes with respect to muscle strength, muscle fiber size, muscle architecture, and stair walking power in elderly postoperative patients. Thirty-six patients (60-86 yr) scheduled for unilateral hip replacement surgery due to hip osteoarthritis were randomized to either 1) resistance training (RT: 3/wk x 12 wk), 2) electrical stimulation (ES: 1 h/day x 12 wk), or 3) standard rehabilitation (SR: 1 h/day x 12 wk). All measurements were performed at baseline, at 5 wk and 12 wk postsurgery. After 12 wk of resistance training, maximal dynamic muscle strength increased by 30% at 60 degrees /s (P < 0.05) and by 29% at 180 degrees /s (P < 0.05); muscle fiber area increased for type I (+17%, P < 0.05), type IIa (+37%, P < 0.05), and type IIx muscle fibers (+51%, P < 0.05); and muscle fiber pennation angle increased by 22% and muscle thickness increased by 15% (P < 0.05). Furthermore, stair walking power increased by 35% (P < 0.05) and was related to the increase in type II fiber area (r = 0.729, P < 0.05). In contrast, there was no increase in any measurement outcomes with electrical stimulation and standard rehabilitation. The present study is the first to demonstrate the effectiveness of resistance training to induce beneficial qualitative changes in muscle fiber morphology and muscle architecture in elderly postoperative patients. In contrast, rehabilitation regimes based on functional exercises and neuromuscular electrical stimulation had no effect. The present data emphasize the importance of resistance training in future rehabilitation programs for elderly individuals.
尽管卧床休息对肌肉力量和肌肉质量的负面影响已得到充分证实,但确定有效的方法来恢复从住院中康复的老年患者的身体能力仍然是一项挑战。本研究比较了不同训练方案对老年术后患者肌肉力量、肌纤维大小、肌肉结构和上下楼梯能力的影响。36例(60 - 86岁)因髋骨关节炎计划接受单侧髋关节置换手术的患者被随机分为三组:1)阻力训练(RT:每周3次,共12周),2)电刺激(ES:每天1小时,共12周),或3)标准康复训练(SR:每天1小时,共12周)。所有测量均在基线、术后5周和12周进行。经过12周的阻力训练,在60度/秒时最大动态肌肉力量增加了30%(P < 0.05),在180度/秒时增加了29%(P < 0.05);I型肌纤维面积增加了17%(P < 0.05),IIa型增加了37%(P < 0.05),IIx型增加了51%(P < 0.05);肌纤维羽状角增加了22%,肌肉厚度增加了15%(P < 0.05)。此外,上下楼梯能力增加了35%(P < 0.05),且与II型肌纤维面积的增加相关(r = 0.729,P < 0.05)。相比之下,电刺激和标准康复训练的任何测量结果均未增加。本研究首次证明了阻力训练能在老年术后患者中诱导肌肉纤维形态和肌肉结构产生有益的质性变化。相比之下,基于功能锻炼和神经肌肉电刺激的康复方案没有效果。本研究数据强调了阻力训练在未来老年个体康复计划中的重要性。