Carpenter Sohee L, Helms Eric R, Pendakur Rachel C, Hibbert Jamie E, Schubert Matthew M
Sport Performance Research in New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Muscle Physiology Laboratory, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 May;25(5):e12298. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12298.
This study's purpose was to compare differences in strength and body composition following high intensity circuit training (HICT) and traditional strength training (TS) in trained women. Fourteen participants (28.5 ± 5.4 years, 160.7 ± 6.1 cm, 65.9 ± 11.7 kg) were randomly assigned to either the HICT group (HICT: n = 7) performing two short circuits with 5 min' rest between each series or the TS group (TS: n = 7) performing one exercise at a time, resting 3 min between sets. Both groups trained 3 days per week for 8 weeks [8-15 repetitions, three sets], close to muscular failure. Body composition, arm and thigh muscle girth, skinfold thickness, and 3RM on six different exercises were assessed before and after the intervention. Both groups similarly increased 3RM across all exercises (p < 0.001). There was a main effect of time (p < 0.001) for both groups on lean body mass indicating an increase in lean mass over time following both protocols, whereas body fat percentage decreased as a factor of time only (p = 0.04). There were no significant group or group × time interactions for any other variable. Therefore, both HICT and TS are similarly effective for increasing strength and lean body mass and decreasing body fat percentage in trained women. Those interested in maximizing time efficiency may prefer HICT, as these sessions took much less time to complete. Other variables such as exercise selection and personal preference should also be taken into consideration when choosing training style.
本研究的目的是比较高强度循环训练(HICT)和传统力量训练(TS)对受过训练的女性力量和身体成分的影响差异。14名参与者(年龄28.5±5.4岁,身高160.7±6.1厘米,体重65.9±11.7千克)被随机分为HICT组(HICT:n = 7),该组进行两组短时间循环训练,每组之间休息5分钟;或TS组(TS:n = 7),该组每次进行一项练习,组间休息3分钟。两组均每周训练3天,共8周[8 - 15次重复,三组],接近肌肉力竭。在干预前后评估身体成分、手臂和大腿肌肉围度、皮褶厚度以及六项不同练习的3次重复最大重量(3RM)。两组在所有练习中的3RM均有相似增加(p < 0.001)。两组在瘦体重方面均有时间主效应(p < 0.001),表明两种训练方案实施后瘦体重随时间增加,而体脂百分比仅作为时间因素下降(p = 0.04)。对于任何其他变量,均无显著的组间或组×时间交互作用。因此,HICT和TS在增加受过训练的女性的力量和瘦体重以及降低体脂百分比方面同样有效。对最大化时间效率感兴趣的人可能更喜欢HICT,因为这些训练课程完成所需时间少得多。在选择训练方式时,还应考虑其他变量,如练习选择和个人偏好。