Suppr超能文献

高强度循环训练与传统力量训练对受过训练女性生理反应的影响

Effects of High Intensity Circuit Versus Traditional Strength Training on Physiological Responses in Trained Women.

作者信息

Carpenter Sohee L, Helms Eric R, Pendakur Rachel C, Hibbert Jamie E, Schubert Matthew M

机构信息

Sport Performance Research in New Zealand (SPRINZ), Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Muscle Physiology Laboratory, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2025 May;25(5):e12298. doi: 10.1002/ejsc.12298.

Abstract

This study's purpose was to compare differences in strength and body composition following high intensity circuit training (HICT) and traditional strength training (TS) in trained women. Fourteen participants (28.5 ± 5.4 years, 160.7 ± 6.1 cm, 65.9 ± 11.7 kg) were randomly assigned to either the HICT group (HICT: n = 7) performing two short circuits with 5 min' rest between each series or the TS group (TS: n = 7) performing one exercise at a time, resting 3 min between sets. Both groups trained 3 days per week for 8 weeks [8-15 repetitions, three sets], close to muscular failure. Body composition, arm and thigh muscle girth, skinfold thickness, and 3RM on six different exercises were assessed before and after the intervention. Both groups similarly increased 3RM across all exercises (p < 0.001). There was a main effect of time (p < 0.001) for both groups on lean body mass indicating an increase in lean mass over time following both protocols, whereas body fat percentage decreased as a factor of time only (p = 0.04). There were no significant group or group × time interactions for any other variable. Therefore, both HICT and TS are similarly effective for increasing strength and lean body mass and decreasing body fat percentage in trained women. Those interested in maximizing time efficiency may prefer HICT, as these sessions took much less time to complete. Other variables such as exercise selection and personal preference should also be taken into consideration when choosing training style.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较高强度循环训练(HICT)和传统力量训练(TS)对受过训练的女性力量和身体成分的影响差异。14名参与者(年龄28.5±5.4岁,身高160.7±6.1厘米,体重65.9±11.7千克)被随机分为HICT组(HICT:n = 7),该组进行两组短时间循环训练,每组之间休息5分钟;或TS组(TS:n = 7),该组每次进行一项练习,组间休息3分钟。两组均每周训练3天,共8周[8 - 15次重复,三组],接近肌肉力竭。在干预前后评估身体成分、手臂和大腿肌肉围度、皮褶厚度以及六项不同练习的3次重复最大重量(3RM)。两组在所有练习中的3RM均有相似增加(p < 0.001)。两组在瘦体重方面均有时间主效应(p < 0.001),表明两种训练方案实施后瘦体重随时间增加,而体脂百分比仅作为时间因素下降(p = 0.04)。对于任何其他变量,均无显著的组间或组×时间交互作用。因此,HICT和TS在增加受过训练的女性的力量和瘦体重以及降低体脂百分比方面同样有效。对最大化时间效率感兴趣的人可能更喜欢HICT,因为这些训练课程完成所需时间少得多。在选择训练方式时,还应考虑其他变量,如练习选择和个人偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5742/12051434/39e8b9f3b480/EJSC-25-e12298-g001.jpg

相似文献

3
Body composition and physical fitness improve after 8 weeks of high-intensity circuit training using body weight in obese women.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2023 Feb;63(2):273-281. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.22.14000-4. Epub 2022 May 27.
7
Similarity in adaptations to high-resistance circuit vs. traditional strength training in resistance-trained men.
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Sep;25(9):2519-27. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182023a51.
8
Effects of a Modified German Volume Training Program on Muscular Hypertrophy and Strength.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Nov;31(11):3109-3119. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001747.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of protein intake to support muscle mass and function in healthy adults.
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Apr;13(2):795-810. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12922. Epub 2022 Feb 20.
4
Effect of high-intensity circuit training on obesity indices, physical fitness, and browning factors in inactive female college students.
J Exerc Rehabil. 2021 Jun 30;17(3):207-213. doi: 10.12965/jer.2142260.130. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
No Time to Lift? Designing Time-Efficient Training Programs for Strength and Hypertrophy: A Narrative Review.
Sports Med. 2021 Oct;51(10):2079-2095. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01490-1. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
6
A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Resistance Training on Whole-Body Muscle Growth in Healthy Adult Males.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):1285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041285.
7
Muscle-Strengthening Exercise Among 397,423 U.S. Adults: Prevalence, Correlates, and Associations With Health Conditions.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6):864-874. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
8
Reliability and validity of various laboratory methods of body composition assessment in young adults.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2019 Mar;39(2):150-159. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12550. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
10
Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Dec;31(12):3508-3523. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002200.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验