Suppr超能文献

包皮环切术对男同性恋者的性体验有影响吗?男性健康(HIM)队列研究的结果。

Does circumcision make a difference to the sexual experience of gay men? Findings from the Health in Men (HIM) cohort.

作者信息

Mao Limin, Templeton David J, Crawford June, Imrie John, Prestage Garrett P, Grulich Andrew E, Donovan Basil, Kaldor John M, Kippax Susan C

机构信息

National Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2008 Nov;5(11):2557-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00845.x. Epub 2008 Apr 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The relevance of circumcision in preventing male-to-male sexual transmission of HIV is poorly understood, in particular because any potential beneficial effect could be diminished by the impact of circumcision on sexual behavior.

AIM

We examined the impact of circumcision on sexual experience.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed on data from 1,426 HIV-negative homosexually active men.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We compared the sexual behaviors and preferences of circumcised with uncircumcised men, and men who were circumcised at infancy with those who were circumcised after infancy.

RESULTS

Overall, 66% of men (N = 939) in the cohort were circumcised. After adjusting for age and ethnicity, we found no differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men in any insertive or receptive anal intercourse, difficulty using condoms, or sexual difficulties (e.g., loss of libido). Among the circumcised men, we compared those circumcised at infancy (N = 854) with those circumcised after infancy (N = 81). The majority cited phimosis (i.e., an inability to fully retract the foreskin) and parents' decision as the main reasons for circumcision after infancy. After adjusting for age and ethnicity, the men circumcised after infancy were more likely to practice any receptive anal sex (88% vs. 75%, P < 0.05) and to experience erection difficulties (52% vs. 47%, P < 0.05), but less likely to practice any insertive anal sex (79% vs. 87%, P < 0.05) and to experience premature ejaculation (15% vs. 23%, P < 0.05) than those circumcised at infancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that overall circumcision status does not affect the HIV-negative gay men's anal sexual behaviors, experience of condom use, or likelihood of sexual difficulties. However, there is some suggestion of differences in sexual practices and preferences among circumcised gay men depending on the age at circumcision. In particular, gay men circumcised later are more likely to engage in and prefer receptive anal intercourse.

摘要

引言

包皮环切术在预防男性间HIV性传播方面的相关性尚不清楚,特别是因为包皮环切术对性行为的影响可能会削弱其任何潜在的有益效果。

目的

我们研究了包皮环切术对性体验的影响。

方法

对1426名HIV阴性的同性恋活跃男性的数据进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。

主要观察指标

我们比较了包皮环切男性与未包皮环切男性的性行为和偏好,以及婴儿期包皮环切的男性与婴儿期后包皮环切的男性。

结果

总体而言,队列中的66%(N = 939)男性进行了包皮环切术。在调整年龄和种族后,我们发现包皮环切男性与未包皮环切男性在任何插入式或接受式肛交、使用避孕套困难或性困难(如性欲减退)方面没有差异。在包皮环切男性中,我们比较了婴儿期包皮环切的男性(N = 854)与婴儿期后包皮环切的男性(N = 81)。大多数人将包茎(即无法完全翻开包皮)和父母的决定作为婴儿期后包皮环切的主要原因。在调整年龄和种族后,婴儿期后包皮环切的男性比婴儿期包皮环切的男性更有可能进行任何接受式肛交(88%对75%,P < 0.05)并经历勃起困难(52%对47%,P < 0.05),但进行任何插入式肛交的可能性较小(79%对87%,P < 0.05),且早泄的可能性较小(15%对23%,P < 0.05)。

结论

我们的数据表明,总体包皮环切状态不会影响HIV阴性男同性恋者的肛交行为、使用避孕套的体验或性困难的可能性。然而,有迹象表明,根据包皮环切的年龄,包皮环切的男同性恋者在性行为和偏好上存在差异。特别是,较晚进行包皮环切的男同性恋者更有可能参与并更喜欢接受式肛交。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验