Suppr超能文献

[胃癌新辅助化疗临床疗效的Meta分析]

[Meta analysis of clinical effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer].

作者信息

He Ling-Feng, Yang Ke-Hu, Tian Jin-Hui, Bai Zheng-Gang

机构信息

Evidence-based Medicine, Cochrane Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, PR China.

出版信息

Ai Zheng. 2008 Apr;27(4):407-12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has gained increasing attention as a treatment for gastric cancer since Wilke first reported its application to the treatment of gastric cancer in 1989. However, its value in treating gastric cancer remains controversial. This research was to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on gastric cancer through a Meta analysis of the randomized controlled trials published worldwide in both English and Chinese.

METHODS

Cochrane systematic evaluation was used to search through Cochrane libraries of clinical comparative trials, PubMed, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Scientific Journal Full-text Database (CSJD) and Chinese Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), aided with manual retrieval and other retrievals. The quality of the assessment was independently evaluated and cross-checked by two evaluators, and the results of homogeneous studies were analyzed with RevMan4.2.10 software.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials involved a total of 838 patients were studied. Of the 5 trials, 2 were performed in Japan, 1 in the Netherlands, 1 in the United Kingdom, 1 in China. Of the 838 patients, 373 were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 465 were treated with surgery alone. Among the above 5 studies, one used blind method and one described random allocation concealment method. No statistical differences were found in the resection rate, cure rate, 1-and 5-year survival rates between neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and surgery group [odds ratio (OR)=1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.67-1.77 for resection rate; OR=1.25, 95% CI=0.85-1.84 for cure rate; OR=1.61, 95% CI=0.90-2.90 for 1-year survival rate; OR=1.13, 95% CI=0.83-1.53 for 5-year survival rate].

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on gastric cancer is not better than that of surgery alone. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should not be recommended as a regular treatment for gastric cancer before obtaining evidences of its certain efficacy on gastric cancer.

摘要

背景与目的

自1989年威尔克首次报道新辅助化疗应用于胃癌治疗以来,其作为胃癌的一种治疗方法日益受到关注。然而,其在治疗胃癌中的价值仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过对全球发表的中英文随机对照试验进行Meta分析,评估新辅助化疗对胃癌的疗效。

方法

采用Cochrane系统评价方法,检索Cochrane临床对照试验库、PubMed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国科学期刊全文数据库(CSJD)和中国期刊全文数据库(CJFD),并辅以手工检索及其他检索方式。由两名评价者独立评价并交叉核对评估质量,采用RevMan4.2.10软件对同质研究结果进行分析。

结果

共纳入5项随机对照试验,涉及838例患者。这5项试验中,2项在日本进行,1项在荷兰,1项在英国,1项在中国。838例患者中,373例接受新辅助化疗,465例仅接受手术治疗。上述5项研究中,1项采用了盲法,1项描述了随机分配隐藏方法。新辅助化疗组与手术组在切除率、治愈率、1年和5年生存率方面未发现统计学差异[切除率:比值比(OR)=1.09,95%置信区间(CI)=0.67 - 1.77;治愈率:OR = 1.25,95% CI = 0.85 - 1.84;1年生存率:OR = 1.61,95% CI = 0.90 - 2.90;5年生存率:OR = 1.13,95% CI = 0.83 - 1.53]。

结论

新辅助化疗对胃癌的疗效并不优于单纯手术治疗。因此,在未获得其对胃癌有确切疗效的证据之前,不应推荐新辅助化疗作为胃癌的常规治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验