Suppr超能文献

传统方法与CASA系统(HTM IVOS)对鸽精液活力和精子浓度评估的比较

The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).

作者信息

Klimowicz M D, Nizanski W, Batkowski F, Savic M A

机构信息

Krakow Agricultural University, Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, Department of Animal Reproduction and Anatomy, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Theriogenology. 2008 Jul 1;70(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

Abstract

The aim of these experiments was to compare conventional, microscopic methods of evaluating pigeon sperm motility and concentration to those measured by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA system). Semen was collected twice a week from two groups of pigeons, each of 40 males (group I: meat-type breed; group II: fancy pigeon) using the lumbo-sacral and cloacal region massage method. Ejaculates collected in each group were diluted 1:100 in BPSE solution and divided into two equal samples. One sample was examined subjectively by microscope and the second one was analysed using CASA system. The sperm concentration was measured by CASA using the anti-collision (AC) system and fluorescent staining (IDENT). There were not any significant differences between the methods of evaluation of sperm concentration. High positive correlations in both groups were observed between the sperm concentration estimated by Thom counting chamber and AC (r=0.87 and r=0.91, respectively), and between the sperm concentration evaluated by Thom counting chamber and IDENT (r=0.85 and r=0.90, respectively). The mean values for CASA measurement of proportion of motile spermatozoa (MOT) and progressive movement (PMOT) were significantly lower than the values estimated subjectively in both groups of pigeons (p< or =0.05 and p< or =0.01, respectively). Positive correlations in MOT and PMOT were noted between both methods of evaluation. The CASA system is very rapid, objective and sensitive method in detecting subtle motility characteristics as well as sperm concentration and is recommended for future research into pigeon semen.

摘要

这些实验的目的是将评估鸽精液活力和浓度的传统显微镜方法与计算机辅助精子分析(CASA系统)所测结果进行比较。每周两次从两组各40只雄性鸽子(第一组:肉用型品种;第二组:观赏鸽)收集精液,采用腰骶部和泄殖腔区域按摩法。每组收集的射精精液用BPSE溶液按1:100稀释,并分成两个相等样本。一个样本通过显微镜进行主观检查,另一个样本使用CASA系统进行分析。使用CASA的抗碰撞(AC)系统和荧光染色(IDENT)测量精子浓度。在精子浓度评估方法之间没有任何显著差异。在两组中,通过托马计数室估计的精子浓度与AC之间(分别为r = 0.87和r = 0.91),以及通过托马计数室评估的精子浓度与IDENT之间(分别为r = 0.85和r = 0.90)均观察到高度正相关。两组鸽子中,CASA测量的活动精子比例(MOT)和渐进运动(PMOT)的平均值均显著低于主观估计值(分别为p≤0.05和p≤0.01)。两种评估方法在MOT和PMOT方面均存在正相关。CASA系统在检测细微的活力特征以及精子浓度方面是一种非常快速、客观且灵敏的方法,推荐用于未来鸽精液的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验