Veterinary Clinic, Division of Small Animal Reproduction, Wroclaw, Poland.
Theriogenology. 2012 Feb;77(3):628-35. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
The aim of these experiments was to compare the conventional, microscopic method of evaluating pigeon sperm viability to sperm assessed by flow cytometry. Semen was collected twice a week from two groups of pigeons. In every group were 20 males (Group I: meat-type breed; Group II: fancy pigeon breed). Semen was collected using the lumbosacral and cloacal region massage method. Ejaculates collected from each group were pooled and diluted to 10 × 10(6) sperm/ml in BPSE solution. Samples were divided into three equal parts and estimated after collection as well as after in vitro storage for 3, 6 and 24 h. The first part was using for semen motility evaluation. The proportion of motile spermatozoa (MOT) and progressive movement (PMOT) of fresh and stored semen were evaluated using the CASA-system. The second part was examined subjectively by microscope (eosin-nigrosin (EN), eosin-nigrosin staining), the third one was assessed using dual fluorescence SYBR-14/propidium iodide (PI) and flow cytometry (FC). There were not any significant differences in sperm viability and motility between the groups at 0, 3, 6, and 24 h post collection. The percentage of viable spermatozoa in fresh semen determined by EN and FC was not different in Groups I and II (I - 88.71 ± 5.42 and 84.01 ± 3.19, respectively; II-90.87 ± 6.01 and 87.38 ± 5.57, respectively). Significantly lower percentages of viable spermatozoa were detected by FC compared to the EN method in both groups after 6 h (P ≤ 0.05) as well as 24 h (P ≤ 0.01) of storage. Moreover, the dual fluorescent SYBR-14/PI staining allowed for the identification a third population of double stained, moribund spermatozoa. High positive correlations in percentage of live spermatozoa were noted between EN and FC methods in both groups of birds. Evaluation of sperm viability by FC is a rapid, accurate, sensitive, and objective method for the assessment of pigeon sperm viability in fresh as well as stored semen.
这些实验的目的是比较传统的评估鸽子精子活力的显微镜方法和流式细胞术评估的精子。每周从两组鸽子中采集两次精液。每组有 20 只雄性(I 组:肉鸽品种;II 组:观赏鸽品种)。使用腰荐部和泄殖腔区域按摩法采集精液。将每组采集的精液混合,在 BPSE 溶液中稀释至 10×10(6)精子/ml。收集后立即将样本分为三部分,并在收集后以及体外储存 3、6 和 24 小时后进行评估。第一部分用于评估精子活力。使用 CASA 系统评估新鲜和储存精液中运动精子的比例(MOT)和前向运动(PMOT)。第二部分用显微镜(伊红-苯胺黑(EN)、伊红-苯胺黑染色)进行主观检查,第三部分用双荧光 SYBR-14/碘化丙啶(PI)和流式细胞术(FC)进行评估。在收集后 0、3、6 和 24 小时,两组之间的精子活力和运动性没有任何显著差异。EN 和 FC 法测定新鲜精液中活精子的百分比在两组之间没有差异(I-88.71±5.42 和 84.01±3.19;II-90.87±6.01 和 87.38±5.57)。在两组中,FC 法检测到的活精子百分比在储存 6 小时(P≤0.05)和 24 小时(P≤0.01)后均显著低于 EN 法。此外,双荧光 SYBR-14/PI 染色可以识别第三群双染濒死精子。两组之间活精子百分比与 EN 和 FC 方法之间存在高度正相关。FC 法评估精子活力是一种快速、准确、敏感和客观的方法,可用于评估新鲜和储存精液中的鸽子精子活力。