文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

作者信息

Pellicano Rebecca, Polkinghorne Kevan R, Kerr Peter G

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jul;52(1):93-101. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.02.296. Epub 2008 Apr 18.


DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.02.296
PMID:18423807
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uremic toxicity is a major concern in the dialysis population. There is keen interest in techniques that increase the removal of larger uremic molecules. We examined the short-term impact of a new, more porous, super-flux Helixone membrane (FX-E) versus the conventional high-flux Helixone membrane (FX-60) on beta(2)-microglobulin (beta2M) reduction and nutritional and inflammatory parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, double blind, crossover, pilot trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A single freestanding dialysis center. 30 stable hemodialysis patients. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated with FX-60 and FX-E membranes for a treatment period of 6 weeks each, with a 2-week washout period in between. OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was change in beta2M concentrations from baseline to end of treatment. Serum samples were obtained predialysis and postdialysis at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, and dialysate albumin samples were collected continuously throughout dialysis sessions. RESULTS: Mean postdialysis beta2M concentrations at the end of 6 weeks of treatment were 6.73 mg/L for FX-E versus 8.22 mg/L for FX-60, which was significantly lower overall by 0.69 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.09 to -0.29; P = 0.001). beta2M reduction ratios were greater overall with FX-E by 4.83% (95% CI, 2.78 to 6.89; P < 0.001), with mean values of 57% for FX-60 versus 66% for FX-E at the end of treatment. Median dialysate albumin loss with FX-E was 1.23 g (range, 0.22 to 4.83 g) compared with 0.17 g (range, 0.0017 to 2.69 g) with FX-60, which was greater by 1.52 g (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93; P < 0.001). Serum albumin concentrations were slightly lower with FX-E by 0.1 g/dL (0.55 g/L; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.07; P = 0.03), but prealbumin concentrations were not significantly different at 8.53 mg/L (95% CI, -23.76 to 6.71; P = 0.3). There were no differences in inflammatory cytokine concentrations or small-solute removal. LIMITATIONS: Short-term pilot study. CONCLUSION: In this stable dialysis population, removal of beta2M was more efficient with the Helixone super-flux FX-E membrane, with only a small decrease in albumin concentrations despite increased albumin loss. Large trials with longer treatment periods are required to evaluate the impact of the FX-E membrane on clinical outcomes.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

Am J Kidney Dis. 2008-7

[2]
A pilot, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study of high cut-off versus high-flux dialysis membranes.

Blood Purif. 2009-9-3

[3]
Increased binding of beta-2-microglobulin to blood cells in dialysis patients treated with high-flux dialyzers compared with low-flux membranes contributed to reduced beta-2-microglobulin concentrations. Results of a cross-over study.

Blood Purif. 2007

[4]
Randomized trial of FX high flux vs standard high flux dialysis for homocysteine clearance.

Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005-10

[5]
The effect of on-line high-flux hemofiltration versus low-flux hemodialysis on mortality in chronic kidney failure: a small randomized controlled trial.

Am J Kidney Dis. 2008-9

[6]
The impact of standard high-flux polysulfone versus novel high-flux polysulfone dialysis membranes on inflammatory markers: a randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial.

Am J Kidney Dis. 2007-4

[7]
Hemodialysis membrane with a high-molecular-weight cutoff and cytokine levels in sepsis complicated by acute renal failure: a phase 1 randomized trial.

Am J Kidney Dis. 2007-8

[8]
[Factors which influence phosphorus removal in hemodialysis].

Nefrologia. 2007

[9]
Elimination of large uremic toxins by a dialyzer specifically designed for high-volume convective therapies.

Blood Purif. 2014

[10]
Dialyzer membrane permeability and survival in hemodialysis patients.

Am J Kidney Dis. 2005-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Thyroid hormone replacement therapy in dialysis/renal insufficiency patients.

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025-2-24

[2]
The Pathogenesis of CKD-Associated Pruritus: A Theoretical Model and Relevance for Treatment.

Kidney360. 2024-11-1

[3]
The membrane perspective of uraemic toxins: which ones should, or can, be removed?

Clin Kidney J. 2021-12-27

[4]
Myoglobin clearance with continuous veno-venous hemodialysis using high cutoff dialyzer versus continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration using high-flux dialyzer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Crit Care. 2020-11-11

[5]
Middle molecule clearance with high cut-off dialyzer versus high-flux dialyzer using continuous veno-venous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

PLoS One. 2019-4-26

[6]
Extracorporeal Treatment in the Management of Acute Poisoning: What an Intensivist Should Know?

Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018-12

[7]
Dialyzer Reuse and Outcomes of High Flux Dialysis.

PLoS One. 2015-6-9

[8]
High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-9-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索