Suppr超能文献

高通量与超高通量透析膜对β2-微球蛋白清除率的影响:一项为期6周的随机双盲交叉试验结果

Reduction in beta2-microglobulin with super-flux versus high-flux dialysis membranes: results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

作者信息

Pellicano Rebecca, Polkinghorne Kevan R, Kerr Peter G

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jul;52(1):93-101. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.02.296. Epub 2008 Apr 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uremic toxicity is a major concern in the dialysis population. There is keen interest in techniques that increase the removal of larger uremic molecules. We examined the short-term impact of a new, more porous, super-flux Helixone membrane (FX-E) versus the conventional high-flux Helixone membrane (FX-60) on beta(2)-microglobulin (beta2M) reduction and nutritional and inflammatory parameters.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, double blind, crossover, pilot trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A single freestanding dialysis center. 30 stable hemodialysis patients.

INTERVENTION

Patients were treated with FX-60 and FX-E membranes for a treatment period of 6 weeks each, with a 2-week washout period in between.

OUTCOME & MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was change in beta2M concentrations from baseline to end of treatment. Serum samples were obtained predialysis and postdialysis at 0, 2, and 6 weeks, and dialysate albumin samples were collected continuously throughout dialysis sessions.

RESULTS

Mean postdialysis beta2M concentrations at the end of 6 weeks of treatment were 6.73 mg/L for FX-E versus 8.22 mg/L for FX-60, which was significantly lower overall by 0.69 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.09 to -0.29; P = 0.001). beta2M reduction ratios were greater overall with FX-E by 4.83% (95% CI, 2.78 to 6.89; P < 0.001), with mean values of 57% for FX-60 versus 66% for FX-E at the end of treatment. Median dialysate albumin loss with FX-E was 1.23 g (range, 0.22 to 4.83 g) compared with 0.17 g (range, 0.0017 to 2.69 g) with FX-60, which was greater by 1.52 g (95% CI, 1.11 to 1.93; P < 0.001). Serum albumin concentrations were slightly lower with FX-E by 0.1 g/dL (0.55 g/L; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.07; P = 0.03), but prealbumin concentrations were not significantly different at 8.53 mg/L (95% CI, -23.76 to 6.71; P = 0.3). There were no differences in inflammatory cytokine concentrations or small-solute removal.

LIMITATIONS

Short-term pilot study.

CONCLUSION

In this stable dialysis population, removal of beta2M was more efficient with the Helixone super-flux FX-E membrane, with only a small decrease in albumin concentrations despite increased albumin loss. Large trials with longer treatment periods are required to evaluate the impact of the FX-E membrane on clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

尿毒症毒性是透析人群的主要关注点。人们对能够增加尿毒症大分子清除的技术有着浓厚兴趣。我们研究了新型、孔隙更多的超通量Helixone膜(FX-E)与传统高通量Helixone膜(FX-60)对β2微球蛋白(β2M)降低以及营养和炎症参数的短期影响。

研究设计

随机、双盲、交叉、试点试验。

设置与参与者

一个独立的透析中心。30名稳定的血液透析患者。

干预措施

患者分别使用FX-60膜和FX-E膜进行为期6周的治疗,期间有2周的洗脱期。

结果与测量

主要结果是从基线到治疗结束时β2M浓度的变化。在透析前以及透析后0周、2周和6周采集血清样本,并且在整个透析过程中持续收集透析液白蛋白样本。

结果

治疗6周结束时,FX-E组透析后β2M的平均浓度为6.73mg/L,而FX-60组为8.22mg/L,总体显著降低了0.69mg/L(95%置信区间[CI],-1.09至-0.29;P = 0.001)。FX-E组β2M的总体降低率更高,为4.83%(95%CI,2.78至6.89;P < 0.001),治疗结束时FX-60组的平均值为57%,而FX-E组为66%。FX-E组透析液白蛋白的中位数损失为1.23g(范围,0.22至4.83g),而FX-60组为0.17g(范围,0.0017至2.69g),FX-E组多损失1.52g(95%CI,1.11至1.93;P < 0.001)。FX-E组血清白蛋白浓度略低0.1g/dL(0.55g/L;95%CI,-1.04至-0.07;P = 0.03),但前白蛋白浓度无显著差异,为8.53mg/L(95%CI,-23.76至6.71;P = 0.3)。炎症细胞因子浓度或小分子溶质清除方面无差异。

局限性

短期试点研究。

结论

在这个稳定的透析人群中,Helixone超通量FX-E膜对β2M的清除更有效,尽管白蛋白损失增加,但白蛋白浓度仅略有下降。需要进行更长治疗期的大型试验来评估FX-E膜对临床结局的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验