Palmer Suetonia C, Rabindranath Kannaiyan S, Craig Jonathan C, Roderick Paul J, Locatelli Francesco, Strippoli Giovanni F M
Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD005016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005016.pub2.
Clinical practice guidelines regarding the use of high-flux haemodialysis membranes vary widely.
We aimed to analyse the current evidence reported for the benefits and harms of high-flux and low-flux haemodialysis.
We searched Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register (July 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (1948 to March 2011), and EMBASE (1947 to March 2011) without language restriction.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared high-flux haemodialysis with low-flux haemodialysis in people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) who required long-term haemodialysis.
Data were extracted independently by two authors for study characteristics (participants and interventions), risks of bias, and outcomes (all-cause mortality and cause-specific mortality, hospitalisation, health-related quality of life, carpal tunnel syndrome, dialysis-related arthropathy, kidney function, and symptoms) among people on haemodialysis. Treatment effects were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random-effects model.
We included 33 studies that involved 3820 participants with ESKD. High-flux membranes reduced cardiovascular mortality (5 studies, 2612 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99) but not all-cause mortality (10 studies, 2915 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.04) or infection-related mortality (3 studies, 2547 participants: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.14). In absolute terms, high-flux membranes may prevent three cardiovascular deaths in 100 people treated with haemodialysis for two years. While high-flux membranes reduced predialysis beta-2 microglobulin levels (MD -12.17 mg/L, 95% CI -15.83 to -8.51 mg/L), insufficient data were available to reliably estimate the effects of membrane flux on hospitalisation, carpal tunnel syndrome, or amyloid-related arthropathy. Evidence for effects of high-flux membranes was limited by selective reporting in a few studies. Insufficient numbers of studies limited our ability to conduct subgroup analyses for membrane type, biocompatibility, or reuse. In general, the risk of bias was either high or unclear in the majority of studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: High-flux haemodialysis may reduce cardiovascular mortality in people requiring haemodialysis by about 15%. A large well-designed RCT is now required to confirm this finding.
关于高通量血液透析膜使用的临床实践指南差异很大。
我们旨在分析目前报道的高通量和低通量血液透析的益处和危害的证据。
我们检索了Cochrane肾脏组专门注册库(2012年7月)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(1948年至2011年3月)和EMBASE(1947年至2011年3月),无语言限制。
我们纳入了比较高通量血液透析与低通量血液透析的随机对照试验(RCT),试验对象为需要长期血液透析的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者。
由两位作者独立提取研究特征(参与者和干预措施)、偏倚风险以及血液透析患者的结局(全因死亡率和特定病因死亡率、住院、健康相关生活质量、腕管综合征、透析相关关节病、肾功能和症状)的数据。治疗效果以风险比(RR)或均值差(MD)表示,并采用随机效应模型计算95%置信区间(CI)。
我们纳入了33项研究,涉及3820例ESKD患者。高通量膜降低了心血管死亡率(5项研究,2612例参与者:RR 0.83,95%CI 0.70至0.99),但未降低全因死亡率(10项研究,2915例参与者:RR 0.95,95%CI 0.87至1.04)或感染相关死亡率(3项研究,2547例参与者:RR 0.91,95%CI 0.71至1.14)。按绝对值计算,高通量膜可能在100例接受两年血液透析治疗的患者中预防3例心血管死亡。虽然高通量膜降低了透析前β2微球蛋白水平(MD -12.17 mg/L,95%CI -15.83至-8.51 mg/L),但现有数据不足以可靠地估计膜通量对住院、腕管综合征或淀粉样变相关关节病的影响。少数研究的选择性报告限制了高通量膜效果的证据。研究数量不足限制了我们对膜类型、生物相容性或复用进行亚组分析的能力。总体而言,大多数研究的偏倚风险较高或不明确。
高通量血液透析可能使需要血液透析的患者心血管死亡率降低约15%。现在需要一项大型精心设计的RCT来证实这一发现。