Stütz Nicolas M, Gohritz Andreas, Novotny Alexander, Falkenberg Udo, Lanz Ulrich, van Schoonhoven Jörg
Handcenter, Bad Neustadt, and Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Klinikum Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Neurosurgery. 2008 Mar;62(3 Suppl 1):194-9; discussion 199-200. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000317393.06680.7d.
To evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological results of 26 patients treated with either a hypothenar fat flap or a synovial flap to prevent recurrent scar compression of the median nerve after previously failed carpal tunnel decompression.
A total of 26 patients underwent flap coverage as a result of a nerve tethering attributable to a position within scar; 15 were covered by a synovial flap and 11 by a hypothenar fat flap. Only patients in whom the median nerve was significantly enveloped in scar tissue were included. All candidates underwent a thorough clinical examination and nerve conduction test. The pre- and postoperative nerve conduction tests and the results of the two groups were statistically compared.
The reduction rates of brachial nocturnal pain and pillar pain were 25 and 25%, respectively, in the synovial flap group and 64 and 37%, respectively, in the hypothenar fat flap group. The reduction rates of a positive Tinel's sign (25%) and a positive Phalen's test (13%) were lower in the synovial flap group compared with hypothenar fat flap coverage (55% Tinel's sign, 46% Phalen's test). Thenar atrophy and paresthesia were reduced in 44 and 62%, respectively, in the synovial flap group and in 46 and 64%, respectively, in the hypothenar fat flap group. The overall patient satisfaction (73%) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (31 points) appeared superior in the hypothenar fat flap group compared with the synovial flap group (56%; 37 points). Nerve conduction tests demonstrated a significant improvement when comparing the pre- and postoperative measurements in both groups. Distal motor latency decreased in the hypothenar fat flap group from 6.81 ms to 4.92 msec (P = 0.01; mean value) and in the synovial flap group from 6.04 ms to 4.43 msec (P < 0.001; mean value).
Coverage by an ulnar-based hypothenar fat flap appeared to produce superior clinical results compared with coverage with synovial tissue from adjacent flexor tendons, although conclusive statistical evaluation of clinical outcomes was not possible. Further studies to confirm this are warranted.
评估26例接受小鱼际脂肪瓣或滑膜瓣治疗的患者的临床和电生理结果,这些患者此前腕管减压失败后,用于预防正中神经复发性瘢痕压迫。
共有26例患者因瘢痕内位置导致神经束缚而接受皮瓣覆盖;15例采用滑膜瓣覆盖,11例采用小鱼际脂肪瓣覆盖。仅纳入正中神经明显被瘢痕组织包裹的患者。所有候选患者均接受了全面的临床检查和神经传导测试。对两组术前和术后的神经传导测试及结果进行统计学比较。
滑膜瓣组夜间臂部疼痛和柱状疼痛的减轻率分别为25%和25%,小鱼际脂肪瓣组分别为64%和37%。与小鱼际脂肪瓣覆盖相比,滑膜瓣组Tinel征阳性率(25%)和Phalen试验阳性率(13%)较低(Tinel征55%,Phalen试验46%)。滑膜瓣组大鱼际萎缩和感觉异常的减轻率分别为44%和62%,小鱼际脂肪瓣组分别为46%和64%。与滑膜瓣组(56%;37分)相比,小鱼际脂肪瓣组患者总体满意度(73%)和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(31分)似乎更高。神经传导测试显示,两组术前和术后测量值比较均有显著改善。小鱼际脂肪瓣组远端运动潜伏期从6.81毫秒降至4.92毫秒(P = 0.01;平均值),滑膜瓣组从6.04毫秒降至4.43毫秒(P < 0.001;平均值)。
尽管无法对临床结果进行确定性统计学评估,但与使用相邻屈肌腱滑膜组织覆盖相比,尺侧小鱼际脂肪瓣覆盖似乎能产生更好的临床效果。有必要进行进一步研究以证实这一点。