• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻修性内镜下腕管松解术:技术与疗效的最新进展

Revision Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: An Update on Technique and Outcomes.

作者信息

Ratigan Conor M, Yocum Derek S, Fuller Sam M

机构信息

From the South Bend Orthopaedics, South Bend, Ind.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 9;12(9):e6138. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006138. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006138
PMID:39258284
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11384870/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel release is among the most frequently conducted upper extremity procedures. While it typically provides patients with improved sensation, decreased pain, and improved function, a small percentage of cases require revision due to failed initial surgery. Consequently, adoption of endoscopic techniques for carpal tunnel revision procedures is beginning to be explored.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of postoperative clinical visits and patient-reported outcome measures for four patients who had undergone five endoscopic revision carpal tunnel release procedures (one patient had bilateral disease). All five cases had symptoms consistent with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.

RESULTS

One hundred percent (5 of 5) of cases resulted in patients reporting symptom improvement. Postoperative clinical visits and improved patient-reported outcome measures (QuickDash, PROMIS Upper Extremity, VAS Pain, PSEQ, PHQ, and Surgery Satisfaction) scores from baseline to 6 weeks demonstrated successful postoperative function and symptom resolution. Five of five cases resulted in patients resuming normal activities without restrictions within 1-5 weeks, with an average of 3.4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary findings suggest the endoscopic revision procedure may be safe and effective for patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome, extending the indications to include scars proximal to the wrist crease. Moreover, this minimally invasive procedure facilitates a transition back to normal activities and avoids incisions on weight-bearing surfaces of the palm. Adopting endoscopic revision may reduce the need for prolonged postoperative care and physical therapy. However, due to the limited sample size of five patients, further investigation with larger cohorts is warranted to confirm these observations.

摘要

背景

腕管松解术是上肢最常开展的手术之一。虽然该手术通常能使患者感觉改善、疼痛减轻、功能增强,但仍有一小部分病例因初次手术失败而需要翻修。因此,人们开始探索将内镜技术应用于腕管翻修手术。

方法

对4例接受了5次内镜下腕管翻修松解手术(1例患者为双侧病变)的患者的术后临床就诊情况及患者报告的结局指标进行回顾性分析。所有5例患者的症状均符合复发性腕管综合征。

结果

100%(5/5)的病例患者报告症状改善。术后临床就诊情况以及患者报告结局指标(QuickDash、上肢患者报告结局测量信息系统、视觉模拟评分法疼痛评分、患者自我效能问卷、患者健康问卷和手术满意度)从基线到6周的评分显示术后功能恢复及症状缓解情况良好。5例患者均在1至5周内恢复正常活动且无限制,平均为3.4周。

结论

初步研究结果表明,内镜翻修手术对于复发性腕管综合征患者可能是安全有效的,其适应证扩展至包括腕横纹近端的瘢痕。此外,这种微创手术有助于患者恢复正常活动,并避免在手掌的负重面上进行切口。采用内镜翻修术可能会减少术后长期护理和物理治疗的需求。然而,由于仅5例患者样本量有限,有必要通过更大样本量的队列研究来进一步证实这些观察结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d649/11384870/0ff153661b95/gox-12-e6138-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d649/11384870/84f87e549006/gox-12-e6138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d649/11384870/00a8b42d78d4/gox-12-e6138-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d649/11384870/0ff153661b95/gox-12-e6138-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d649/11384870/84f87e549006/gox-12-e6138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d649/11384870/00a8b42d78d4/gox-12-e6138-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d649/11384870/0ff153661b95/gox-12-e6138-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Revision Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: An Update on Technique and Outcomes.翻修性内镜下腕管松解术:技术与疗效的最新进展
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 9;12(9):e6138. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006138. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Endoscopic revision of carpal tunnel release.腕管松解术的内镜翻修术
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jun;121(6):2029-2034. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817123de.
3
Early Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release.内镜与开放式腕管松解术的早期结果。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Oct;46(10):868-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.04.030. Epub 2021 May 25.
4
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征的内镜下松解术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD008265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008265.pub2.
5
Minimally invasive carpal tunnel decompression using the KnifeLight.使用KnifeLight进行微创腕管减压术。
Neurosurgery. 2007 Feb;60(2 Suppl 1):ONS162-8; discussion ONS168-9. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000249249.33052.7E.
6
Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Surgery: Risk Factors and Rates of Revision Surgery.内镜与开放式腕管松解术:危险因素与翻修手术率。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Aug;48(8):757-763. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
7
Revision surgery for persistent and recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome and for failed carpal tunnel release.腕管综合征持续性和复发性以及腕管松解术失败的修复手术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Mar;129(3):683-692. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182402c37.
8
Evaluation of PROMIS' Ability to Detect Immediate Postoperative Symptom Improvement Following Carpal Tunnel Release.评价 PROMIS 在检测腕管松解术后即刻症状改善方面的能力。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Jun;46(6):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
9
Patient-reported outcomes after open carpal tunnel release using a standard protocol with 1 hand therapy visit.采用标准方案并进行1次手部治疗后,患者报告的开放性腕管松解术后的结果。
J Hand Ther. 2017 Jan-Mar;30(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
10
Bilateral simultaneous endoscopic carpal tunnel release: Mean time to resume activities of daily living and return to work.双侧同时内镜下腕管松解术:恢复日常生活活动及重返工作岗位的平均时间。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2018 Jun;37(3):175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Reoperation Rates and Short-Term Complications Following Endoscopic vs. Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Longitudinal Analysis.内镜下与开放性腕管松解术后的再次手术率及短期并发症:一项纵向分析。
Hand (N Y). 2025 May 3:15589447251333817. doi: 10.1177/15589447251333817.
2
Manual Therapy vs. Surgery: Which Is Best for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Relief?手法治疗与手术:哪种方法最适合缓解腕管综合征?
Life (Basel). 2024 Oct 11;14(10):1286. doi: 10.3390/life14101286.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit for the Pain Visual Analog Scale in a Postoperative Hand Surgery Population.确立术后手部手术人群疼痛视觉模拟量表的最小临床重要差异和实质性临床获益。
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Jul;47(7):645-653. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Revision of Carpal Tunnel Surgery.腕管手术的修订
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 3;11(5):1386. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051386.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release.开放式与内窥镜下腕管松解术的成本效益比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Feb 17;103(4):343-355. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01354.
4
Open versus endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.开放性与内镜下腕管松解术:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 27;21(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03306-1.
5
Revision Carpal Tunnel Release: Risk Factors and Rate of Secondary Surgery.腕管松解术的修正:危险因素和二次手术率。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;145(5):1204-1214. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006742.
6
Endoscopic Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release.内镜下与开放性腕管松解术
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Dec;12(4):509-514. doi: 10.1007/s12178-019-09584-0.
7
Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome: Evaluation and treatment of the possible causes.复发性腕管综合征:可能病因的评估与治疗
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Sep 26;6(10):365-372. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i10.365.
8
Arthritis as a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.关节炎作为腕管综合征的一个风险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Scand J Rheumatol. 2016 Oct;45(5):339-46. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2015.1114141. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Long-term outcomes of carpal tunnel release: a critical review of the literature.腕管松解术的长期疗效:文献综述
Hand (N Y). 2012 Sep;7(3):242-6. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9429-x.
10
Diffusion tensor imaging of the median nerve in recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome - initial experience.复发性腕管综合征正中神经的扩散张量成像——初步经验
Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):3115-23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2986-8. Epub 2013 Aug 27.