Zieske Lawrence, Ebersole Gregory C, Davidge Kristen, Fox Ida, Mackinnon Susan E
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 Aug;38(8):1530-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
To evaluate intraoperative findings and outcomes of revision carpal tunnel release (CTR) and to identify predictors of pain outcomes.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all adult patients undergoing revision CTR between 2001 and 2012. Patients were classified according to whether they presented with persistent, recurrent, or new symptoms. We compared study groups by baseline characteristics, intraoperative findings, and outcomes (strength and pain). Within each group, we analyzed changes in postoperative pinch strength, grip strength, and pain from baseline. Predictors of postoperative average pain were examined using both multivariable linear regression analyses and univariable logistic regression to calculate odds ratios of worsened or no change in pain.
We performed revision CTR in 97 extremities (87 patients). Symptoms were classified as persistent in 42 hands, recurrent in 19, and new in 36. The recurrent group demonstrated more diabetes and a longer interval from primary CTR, and was less likely to present with pain. Incomplete release of the flexor retinaculum and scarring of the median nerve were common intraoperative findings over all. Nerve injury was more common in the new group. Postoperative pinch strength, grip strength, and pain significantly improved from baseline in all groups, apart from strength measures in the recurrent group. Persistent symptoms and more than 1 prior CTR had higher odds of not changing or worsening postoperative pain. Higher preoperative pain, use of pain medication, and workers' compensation were significant predictors of higher postoperative average pain.
Carpal tunnel release may not always be entirely successful. Most patients improve after revision CTR, but a methodical approach to diagnosis and adherence to safe surgical principles are likely to improve outcomes. Symptom classification, number of prior CTRs, baseline pain, pain medications, and workers' compensation status are important predictors of pain outcomes in this population.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic III.
评估翻修性腕管松解术(CTR)的术中发现及结果,并确定疼痛结果的预测因素。
我们对2001年至2012年间所有接受翻修性CTR的成年患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。根据患者出现的是持续性、复发性还是新症状进行分类。我们通过基线特征、术中发现及结果(力量和疼痛)对研究组进行比较。在每组中,我们分析了术后捏力、握力及疼痛相对于基线的变化。使用多变量线性回归分析和单变量逻辑回归来检验术后平均疼痛的预测因素,以计算疼痛加重或无变化的比值比。
我们对97个肢体(87例患者)进行了翻修性CTR。症状分类为42只手为持续性,19只为复发性,36只为新出现的。复发性组糖尿病更多,距初次CTR的时间间隔更长,且疼痛出现的可能性较小。在所有病例中,屈肌支持带松解不完全及正中神经瘢痕形成是常见的术中发现。神经损伤在新症状组中更常见。除复发性组的力量测量外,所有组的术后捏力、握力及疼痛相对于基线均有显著改善。持续性症状及既往接受过1次以上CTR的患者术后疼痛无变化或加重的几率更高。术前疼痛程度较高、使用止痛药物及工伤赔偿是术后平均疼痛较高的显著预测因素。
腕管松解术并非总能完全成功。大多数患者在翻修性CTR后有所改善,但采用系统的诊断方法并遵循安全的手术原则可能会改善结果。症状分类、既往CTR次数、基线疼痛、止痛药物及工伤赔偿状况是该人群疼痛结果的重要预测因素。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性III级。