Verguts Tom, Notebaert Wim
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):518-25. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.518.
The conflict monitoring model of M. M. Botvinick, T. S. Braver, D. M. Barch, C. S. Carter, and J. D. Cohen (2001) triggered several research programs investigating various aspects of cognitive control. One problematic aspect of the Botvinick et al. model is that there is no clear account of how the cognitive system knows where to intervene when conflict is detected. As a result, recent findings of task-specific and context-specific (e.g., item-specific) adaptation are difficult to interpret. The difficulty with item-specific adaptation was recently pointed out by C. Blais, S. Robidoux, E. F. Risko, and D. Besner (2007), who proposed an alternative model that could account for this. However, the same problem of where the cognitive system should intervene resurfaces in a different shape in this model, and it has difficulty in accounting for the Gratton effect, a hallmark item-nonspecific effect. The authors of the current article show how these problems can be solved when cognitive control is implemented as a conflict-modulated Hebbian learning rule.
M. M. 博特温尼克、T. S. 布雷弗、D. M. 巴奇、C. S. 卡特和J. D. 科恩(2001年)的冲突监测模型引发了多个研究项目,这些项目对认知控制的各个方面进行了调查。博特温尼克等人模型的一个问题是,对于认知系统在检测到冲突时如何知道在哪里进行干预,没有明确的解释。因此,最近关于特定任务和特定情境(如特定项目)适应性的研究结果难以解释。C. 布莱斯、S. 罗比杜克斯、E. F. 里斯科和D. 贝斯纳(2007年)最近指出了特定项目适应性的困难,他们提出了一个可以解释这一现象的替代模型。然而,认知系统应该在哪里进行干预的同样问题在这个模型中以不同的形式再次出现,并且它难以解释格拉顿效应,这是一种典型的非特定项目效应。本文作者展示了将认知控制实施为冲突调制的赫布学习规则时,这些问题是如何得到解决的。