Behar Evelyn, DiMarco Ilyse Dobrow, Hekler Eric B, Mohlman Jan, Staples Alison M
University of Illinois at Chicago, Dept. of Psychology (M/C 285), Chicago, IL 60607-7137, USA.
J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Dec;23(8):1011-23. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
Theoretical conceptualizations of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) continue to undergo scrutiny and refinement. The current paper critiques five contemporary models of GAD: the Avoidance Model of Worry and GAD [Borkovec, T. D. (1994). The nature, functions, and origins of worry. In: G. Davey & F. Tallis (Eds.), Worrying: perspectives on theory assessment and treatment (pp. 5-33). Sussex, England: Wiley & Sons; Borkovec, T. D., Alcaine, O. M., & Behar, E. (2004). Avoidance theory of worry and generalized anxiety disorder. In: R. Heimberg, C. Turk, & D. Mennin (Eds.), Generalized anxiety disorder: advances in research and practice (pp. 77-108). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press]; the Intolerance of Uncertainty Model [Dugas, M. J., Letarte, H., Rheaume, J., Freeston, M. H., & Ladouceur, R. (1995). Worry and problem solving: evidence of a specific relationship. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 109-120; Freeston, M. H., Rheaume, J., Letarte, H., Dugas, M. J., & Ladouceur, R. (1994). Why do people worry? Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 791-802]; the Metacognitive Model [Wells, A. (1995). Meta-cognition and worry: a cognitive model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 23, 301-320]; the Emotion Dysregulation Model [Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2002). Applying an emotion regulation framework to integrative approaches to generalized anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 85-90]; and the Acceptance-based Model of GAD [Roemer, L., & Orsillo, S. M. (2002). Expanding our conceptualization of and treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: integrating mindfulness/acceptance-based approaches with existing cognitive behavioral models. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 54-68]. Evidence in support of each model is critically reviewed, and each model's corresponding evidence-based therapeutic interventions are discussed. Generally speaking, the models share an emphasis on avoidance of internal affective experiences (i.e., thoughts, beliefs, and emotions). The models cluster into three types: cognitive models (i.e., IUM, MCM), emotional/experiential (i.e., EDM, ABM), and an integrated model (AMW). This clustering offers directions for future research and new treatment strategies.
广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的理论概念仍在不断接受审视和完善。本文对当代五种GAD模型进行了批判:担忧与GAD的回避模型[博尔科维奇,T.D.(1994年)。担忧的本质、功能及起源。载于:G.戴维和F.塔利斯(编),《担忧:理论评估与治疗的视角》(第5 - 33页)。英国苏塞克斯:威利父子出版社;博尔科维奇,T.D.,阿尔卡因,O.M.,& 贝哈尔,E.(2004年)。担忧与广泛性焦虑症的回避理论。载于:R.海姆伯格、C.特克和D.门宁(编),《广泛性焦虑症:研究与实践的进展》(第77 - 108页)。美国纽约:吉尔福德出版社];不确定性不耐受模型[杜加斯,M.J.,勒塔特,H.,雷奥姆,J.,弗雷斯通,M.H.,& 拉杜塞厄尔,R.(1995年)。担忧与问题解决:一种特定关系的证据。《认知疗法与研究》,19,109 - 120;弗雷斯通,M.H.,雷奥姆,J.,勒塔特,H.,杜加斯,M.J.,& 拉杜塞厄尔,R.(1994年)。人们为何担忧?《个性与个体差异》,17,791 - 802];元认知模型[韦尔斯,A.(1995年)。元认知与担忧:广泛性焦虑症的认知模型。《行为与认知心理治疗》,23,301 - 320];情绪失调模型[门宁,D.S.,海姆伯格,R.G.,特克,C.L.,& 弗雷斯科,D.M.(2002年)。将情绪调节框架应用于广泛性焦虑症的综合治疗方法。《临床心理学:科学与实践》,9,85 - 90];以及基于接纳的GAD模型[罗默,L.,& 奥尔西洛,S.M.(2002年)。扩展我们对广泛性焦虑症的概念化及治疗:将基于正念/接纳的方法与现有的认知行为模型相结合。《临床心理学:科学与实践》,9,54 - 68]。对支持每种模型的证据进行了批判性审查,并讨论了每种模型相应的循证治疗干预措施。一般来说,这些模型都强调避免内部情感体验(即想法、信念和情绪)。这些模型可分为三种类型:认知模型(即IUM、MCM)、情绪/体验模型(即EDM、ABM)和综合模型(AMW)。这种分类为未来的研究和新的治疗策略提供了方向。