Gheza Davide, Kool Wouter
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Mar;9(3):534-553. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02088-z. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
Goal-directed behaviour requires humans to constantly manage and switch between multiple, independent and conflicting sources of information. Conventional cognitive control tasks, however, only feature one task and one source of distraction. Therefore, it is unclear how control is allocated in multidimensional environments. To address this question, we developed a multidimensional task-set interference paradigm, in which people need to manage distraction from three independent dimensions. We use this task to test whether people adapt to previous conflict by enhancing task-relevant information or suppressing task-irrelevant information. Three experiments provided strong evidence for the latter hypothesis. Moreover, control adaptation was highly dimension specific. Conflict from a given dimension only affected processing of that same dimension on subsequent trials, with no evidence for generalization. A new neural network model shows that our results can only be simulated when including multiple independent conflict-detector units. Our results call for an update to classic models of cognitive control and their neurocomputational underpinnings.
目标导向行为要求人类不断管理多个独立且相互冲突的信息源,并在它们之间进行切换。然而,传统的认知控制任务仅涉及一项任务和一个干扰源。因此,目前尚不清楚在多维度环境中控制是如何分配的。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种多维度任务集干扰范式,在此范式中人们需要管理来自三个独立维度的干扰。我们使用这个任务来测试人们是否通过增强与任务相关的信息或抑制与任务无关的信息来适应先前的冲突。三个实验为后一种假设提供了有力证据。此外,控制适应具有高度的维度特异性。给定维度的冲突仅影响后续试验中同一维度的处理,没有泛化的证据。一个新的神经网络模型表明,只有在包含多个独立的冲突检测单元时,才能模拟我们的结果。我们的结果呼吁对认知控制的经典模型及其神经计算基础进行更新。