Suppr超能文献

全内镜下椎间孔和经椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术与传统显微外科技术的前瞻性随机对照研究

Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

作者信息

Ruetten Sebastian, Komp Martin, Merk Harry, Godolias Georgios

机构信息

Department of Spine Surgery and Pain Therapy, Center for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, St. Anna-Hospital Herne, University of Witten/Herdecke, Herne, Germany.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 20;33(9):931-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8af7.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study of patients with lumbar disc herniations, operated either in a full-endoscopic or microsurgical technique.

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of results of lumbar discectomies in full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal technique with the conventional microsurgical technique.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Even with good results, conventional disc operations may result in subsequent damage due to trauma. Endoscopic techniques have become the standard in many areas because of the advantages they offer intraoperatively and after surgery. With the transforaminal and interlaminar techniques, 2 full-endoscopic procedures are available for lumbar disc operations.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-eight patients with full-endoscopic or microsurgical discectomy underwent follow-up for 2 years. In addition to general and specific parameters, the following measuring instruments were used: VAS, German version North American Spine Society Instrument, Oswestry Low-Back Pain Disability Questionnaire.

RESULTS

After surgery 82% of the patients no longer had leg pain, and 14% had occasional pain. The clinical results were the same in both groups. The recurrence rate was 6.2% with no difference between the groups. The full-endoscopic techniques brought significant advantages in the following areas: back pain, rehabilitation, complications, and traumatization.

CONCLUSION

The clinical results of the full-endoscopic technique are equal to those of the microsurgical technique. At the same time, there are advantages in the operation technique and reduced traumatization. With the surgical devices and the possibility of selecting an interlaminar or posterolateral to lateral transforaminal procedure, lumbar disc herniations outside and inside the spinal canal can be sufficiently removed using the full-endoscopic technique, when taking the appropriate criteria into account. Full-endoscopic surgery is a sufficient and safe supplementation and alternative to microsurgical procedures.

摘要

研究设计

对腰椎间盘突出症患者进行前瞻性、随机、对照研究,采用全内镜或显微外科技术进行手术。

目的

比较全内镜下椎板间和经椎间孔技术行腰椎间盘切除术与传统显微外科技术的结果。

背景资料总结

即使传统椎间盘手术效果良好,也可能因创伤导致后续损伤。内镜技术因其术中及术后的优势,已成为许多领域的标准术式。经椎间孔和椎板间技术为腰椎间盘手术提供了两种全内镜手术方法。

方法

178例行全内镜或显微外科椎间盘切除术的患者接受了2年的随访。除一般和特定参数外,还使用了以下测量工具:视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、德文版北美脊柱协会器械、奥斯威斯瑞腰痛残疾问卷。

结果

术后82%的患者不再有腿痛,14%的患者偶尔有疼痛。两组临床结果相同。复发率为6.2%,两组间无差异。全内镜技术在以下方面具有显著优势:背痛、康复、并发症和创伤。

结论

全内镜技术的临床结果与显微外科技术相当。同时,在手术技术和减少创伤方面具有优势。借助手术器械以及选择椎板间或后外侧至外侧经椎间孔手术的可能性,在考虑适当标准的情况下,使用全内镜技术可充分切除椎管内外的腰椎间盘突出症。全内镜手术是显微外科手术的充分且安全的补充和替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验