• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧双通道内镜术后复发性腰椎间盘突出症的危险因素:一项回顾性研究

Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after unilateral biportal endoscopy: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Zhang Yaoshen, Ding Zihao, Wang Jie, Guan Li, Liu Yuzeng, Hai Yong

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

, Joint Laboratory for Research & Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury in SpinalDeformity, Capital Medical University, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06577-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-025-06577-2
PMID:40515760
Abstract

PURPOSE

Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a predominantly minimally invasive surgical technique for addressing LDH. Nonetheless, recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) remains the predominant reason for reoperation following UBE. This retrospective study examined the risk factors and reoperation rates for rLDH following UBE. This study aimed to examine the risk factors associated with rLDH and the reoperation rate after single-level UBE.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 205 patients who underwent UBE for single-level LDH from 2019 to 2023 to determine reoperation causes and related risk variables. Reoperation was characterized as the postoperative radiological evidence of persistent symptomatic disc herniation at the same level, necessitating further surgical intervention. We gathered radiographic and demographic parameters preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients with recurrent LDH had additional evaluation during recurrence and revision operations.

RESULTS

Of the 205 patients, 21 (10.2%) required further rLDH revision surgery. The multivariate analysis indicated that obesity and elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were independent risk variables with strong predictive value for reoperation after controlling for other potential risk factors. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff points for UBE were body mass index (BMI) = 25.775 kg/m and FBG = 5.155 mmol/L.

CONCLUSION

This study identified obesity (BMI > 25.775 kg/m²) and elevated FBG levels (> 5.155 mmol/L) as independent risk factors for UBE reoperation. Hence, we recommend longer rehabilitation interventions, such as wearing a suitable brace and strengthening the paraspinal muscles, for patients with obesity and high FBG who undergo UBE.

摘要

目的

单侧双通道内镜技术(UBE)是一种主要用于治疗腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的微创手术技术。尽管如此,复发性腰椎间盘突出症(rLDH)仍然是UBE术后再次手术的主要原因。本回顾性研究探讨了UBE术后rLDH的危险因素及再次手术率。本研究旨在探讨与rLDH相关的危险因素以及单节段UBE术后的再次手术率。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2019年至2023年期间接受单节段LDH的UBE手术的205例患者,以确定再次手术的原因及相关风险变量。再次手术的定义为术后影像学显示同一节段存在持续有症状的椎间盘突出,需要进一步手术干预。我们收集了术前和术后的影像学及人口统计学参数。复发性LDH患者在复发和翻修手术期间进行了额外评估。

结果

205例患者中,21例(10.2%)需要进行rLDH翻修手术。多因素分析表明,在控制其他潜在危险因素后,肥胖和空腹血糖(FBG)水平升高是具有较强预测价值的再次手术独立风险变量。根据受试者工作特征曲线分析,UBE的截断点为体重指数(BMI)=25.775kg/m²和FBG=5.155mmol/L。

结论

本研究确定肥胖(BMI>25.775kg/m²)和FBG水平升高(>5.155mmol/L)是UBE再次手术的独立危险因素。因此,我们建议对接受UBE手术的肥胖和高FBG患者进行更长时间的康复干预,如佩戴合适的支具和加强椎旁肌锻炼。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for recurrent lumbar disc herniation after unilateral biportal endoscopy: a retrospective study.单侧双通道内镜术后复发性腰椎间盘突出症的危险因素:一项回顾性研究
Int Orthop. 2025 Jun 14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06577-2.
2
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting postoperative recurrent lumbar disc herniation after unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy.预测单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术后腰椎间盘突出症复发的列线图的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 20;15(1):26336. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10943-w.
3
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation Linked with Posterior Ring Apophysis Separation: A Retrospective Study.单侧双孔通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗伴后环骨突分离的腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:957-963. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.102. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
4
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy (UBE) Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) for Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation in Obese Patients: A Retrospective Study.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术(UBE)与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)治疗肥胖患者腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jun 28;31:e948530. doi: 10.12659/MSM.948530.
5
[Early effectiveness of posterior 180-degree decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with MSU-1 lumbar disc herniation].[经单侧双通道内镜下后路180°减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并MSU-1型腰椎间盘突出症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 15;39(6):735-740. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202504083.
6
Kirschner wire as an effective localization tool in UBE discectomy: enhancing segmental localization accuracy and optimizing decompression margins.克氏针作为UBE椎间盘切除术的有效定位工具:提高节段定位准确性并优化减压范围
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03811-0.
7
Nomogram for prediction of recurrence in patients with lumbar disc herniation after unilateral biportal endoscopy spinal surgery: a retrospective study.单通道双孔道内镜下脊柱手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症患者复发预测列线图:一项回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 16;12:1564825. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1564825. eCollection 2025.
8
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy via the Contralateral Sublaminar Approach for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Very High-Grade Migration: A Technical Note and Case Series.经对侧椎板下入路单侧双孔道内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗极高度移位型腰椎间盘突出症:技术说明与病例系列
World Neurosurg. 2025 May;197:123939. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123939. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
9
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and muscle injury in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery, unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, and percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy: a six-month follow-up.关节镜辅助单通道脊柱手术、单侧双通道内镜手术和经皮椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的短期临床疗效及肌肉损伤比较:六个月随访
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 21;20(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06088-1.
10
Clinical Efficacy of Biportal versus Uniportal Endoscopic Discectomy for Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study Analysis.双孔与单孔内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗极外侧腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究分析
World Neurosurg. 2025 May;197:123788. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123788. Epub 2025 Mar 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of surgical outcomes between unilateral biportal endoscopic technique and open microdiscectomy in patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation: a single-center retrospective study in China.单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者单侧双孔椎间孔镜技术与开放显微椎间盘切除术的手术效果比较:中国一项单中心回顾性研究
Asian Spine J. 2025 Aug;19(4):600-608. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0002. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
2
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Debridement and Drainage for Lumbar Infectious Spondylodiscitis: A Retrospective Study and Preliminary Results.单侧双孔道内镜下清创引流术治疗腰椎感染性脊柱炎:一项回顾性研究及初步结果
J Inflamm Res. 2025 Mar 13;18:3695-3704. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S505707. eCollection 2025.
3
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression versus posterior short-segment fusion for treating degenerative lumbar scoliosis with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cohort study with a minimum five year followup.
经皮椎间孔镜减压术与后路短节段融合术治疗退变性腰椎侧弯伴腰椎管狭窄症:一项至少随访五年的队列研究
Int Orthop. 2025 May;49(5):1211-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06479-3. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
4
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis associated with spinal stenosis in elderly individuals: a matched comparison study.经皮椎间孔内镜减压治疗老年退行性腰椎侧凸伴椎管狭窄的临床疗效:一项匹配对照研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Dec;48(12):3197-3205. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06318-x. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
5
Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for high-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation: clinical efficacy and safety assessment.经皮内镜下椎间孔入路腰椎间盘切除术治疗高位移行型腰椎间盘突出症:临床疗效与安全性评估。
Int Orthop. 2024 Sep;48(9):2455-2463. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06246-w. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
6
The efficacy and safety of mini-open (air/water medium) endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.微型开放(空气/水介质)内镜辅助下颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术治疗脊髓型颈椎病的疗效与安全性。
Int Orthop. 2024 Aug;48(8):2243-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06212-6. Epub 2024 May 22.
7
Comparison of lumbar microdiscectomy and unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy outcomes: a single-center experience.腰椎间盘显微切除术与单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术疗效比较:单中心经验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2023 Dec 8;40(3):351-358. doi: 10.3171/2023.10.SPINE23718. Print 2024 Mar 1.
8
Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy via lateral superior articular process approach for treating far lateral lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study and technical note.经侧方上关节突入路全内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗极外侧型腰椎间盘突出症:回顾性研究和技术说明。
Int Orthop. 2023 Nov;47(11):2843-2850. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05937-0. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
9
Biportal endoscopic paraspinal decompressive foraminotomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis: clinical outcomes and factors influencing unsatisfactory outcomes.双通道内窥镜下脊柱旁减压椎间孔切开术治疗腰椎侧隐窝狭窄:临床疗效及影响疗效不佳的因素。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Aug;165(8):2153-2163. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05706-3. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
10
Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis.单节段腰椎间盘切除术采用单侧双孔道内镜技术与开放式显微椎间盘切除术的临床比较:一项多中心回顾性分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jan 31;13(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0725-1.