• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BI-RADS最终评估在乳腺超声联合乳腺X线摄影中的临床应用。

Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography.

作者信息

Kim Eun-Kyung, Ko Kyung Hee, Oh Ki Keun, Kwak Jin Young, You Jai Kyung, Kim Min Jung, Park Byoung-Woo

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 134, Shinchon-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, South Korea.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1209-15. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3259.

DOI:10.2214/AJR.07.3259
PMID:18430833
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to report the results of classification of sonographic findings according to BI-RADS and to calculate the positive predictive value (PPV) for each BI-RADS assessment category.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We prospectively classified 4,668 breast sonograms according to BI-RADS final assessment category. Suspicious sonographic findings were divided into major and minor suspicious findings. Category 1 was normal and category 2 was a benign finding such as cyst or nodule with uniform and intense hyperechogenicity. A nodule neither category 2 nor category 4 or 5 was defined as category 3. A nodule with one or more suspicious findings, not category 5, was defined as category 4. A nodule with two or more major suspicious findings was defined as category 5.

RESULTS

Of the 4,668 cases, 321 cases failed to undergo follow-up of at least 1 year. The PPV was 0.1% in category 1 (3/2,191), 0% in category 2 (0/773), 0.8% in category 3 (6/737), 31.1% in category 4 (161/519), and 96.9% in category 5 (123/127). In palpable lesions (n = 751), the PPV was 2.2% in category 1 (2/93), 0.9% in category 3 (2/217), 54% in category 4 (107/198), and 98% in category 5 (98/100). In nonpalpable lesions (n = 3,596), the PPV was 0.05% in category 1 (1/2,098), 0.8% in category 3 (4/520), 16.8% in category 4 (54/321), and 92.6% in category 5 (25/27).

CONCLUSION

As with mammography, placing sonographic lesions into BI-RADS categories is useful for predicting the presence of malignancy.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是报告根据美国放射学会(ACR)乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)对超声检查结果进行分类的结果,并计算每个BI-RADS评估类别的阳性预测值(PPV)。

对象与方法

我们根据BI-RADS最终评估类别对4668例乳腺超声检查进行前瞻性分类。可疑超声检查结果分为主要和次要可疑结果。1类为正常,2类为良性发现,如囊肿或具有均匀且强烈高回声性的结节。既不属于2类也不属于4类或5类的结节定义为3类。有一个或多个可疑结果(非5类)的结节定义为4类。有两个或更多主要可疑结果的结节定义为5类。

结果

在4668例病例中,321例未接受至少1年的随访。1类的PPV为0.1%(3/2191),2类为0%(0/773),3类为0.8%(6/737),4类为31.1%(161/519),5类为96.9%(123/127)。在可触及病变(n = 751)中,1类的PPV为2.2%(2/93),3类为0.9%(2/217),4类为54%(107/198),5类为98%(98/100)。在不可触及病变(n = 3596)中,1类的PPV为0.05%(1/2098),3类为0.8%(4/520),4类为16.8%(54/321),5类为92.6%(25/27)。

结论

与乳腺X线摄影一样,将超声病变分类为BI-RADS类别有助于预测恶性肿瘤的存在。

相似文献

1
Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography.BI-RADS最终评估在乳腺超声联合乳腺X线摄影中的临床应用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1209-15. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3259.
2
Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.年龄对超声 BI-RADS 类别 3、4 和 5 的 PPV 的影响。
Ultraschall Med. 2011 Jan;32 Suppl 1:S8-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245384. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
3
BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy.BI-RADS分类作为恶性肿瘤的预测指标。
Radiology. 1999 Jun;211(3):845-50. doi: 10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn31845.
4
Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS.基于BI-RADS使用标准的乳腺超声检查结果分类准确性
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;32(4):573-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.5191.
5
[Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].[诊断性乳腺钼靶摄影与超声检查:乳腺影像报告评估与最终临床结果的一致性]
Rofo. 2005 Nov;177(11):1545-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858636.
6
Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.乳腺 X 线筛查和超声筛查检出 BI-RADS 4 类病变的评估:磁共振成像的应用。
Radiology. 2015 Feb;274(2):343-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140645. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
7
The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.乳腺影像报告和数据系统:乳腺X线摄影特征的阳性预测值及最终评估分类
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jul;171(1):35-40. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.1.9648759.
8
BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.用于超声和乳腺钼靶检查的BI-RADS词典:观察者间的变异性和阳性预测值。
Radiology. 2006 May;239(2):385-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2392042127. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
9
Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.重新审视乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3类病变的乳腺钼靶随访
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Sep;179(3):691-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.3.1790691.
10
Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.乳腺超声筛查中检测到的BI-RADS 3类病变的重新评估及随访结果
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar;206(3):666-72. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14785.

引用本文的文献

1
The diagnostic value of real-time ultrasound elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in BI-RADS 4A breast lesions.实时超声弹性成像和超声造影在乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)4A类乳腺病变中的诊断价值
Gland Surg. 2025 Mar 31;14(3):488-497. doi: 10.21037/gs-2025-93. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
Evaluation of BI-RADS 3 Ultrasound Findings: the Frequency and Incidence of Malignant Lesions, and Tumor Size.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3类超声检查结果评估:恶性病变的频率、发生率及肿瘤大小
Acta Med Acad. 2025 Apr;54(1):1-6. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.467.
3
Comparative analysis of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) combined with conventional hand-held ultrasound and mammography in female breast cancer detection.
自动乳腺容积扫描仪(ABVS)联合传统手持超声及乳腺钼靶在女性乳腺癌检测中的对比分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Dec 2;86(1):159-165. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001539. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Evaluation of Two-Year Follow-Up of Patients with BI-RADS 3 Breast Ultrasound Lesions in a Single Private Ultrasound Study.一项私立超声研究中对BI-RADS 3级乳腺超声病变患者的两年随访评估。
Adv Biomed Res. 2023 Oct 28;12:236. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_10_23. eCollection 2023.
5
Application of Point Shearwave Elastography to Breast Ultrasonography: Initial Experience Using "S-Shearwave" in Differential Diagnosis.点剪切波弹性成像在乳腺超声检查中的应用:使用“S-剪切波”进行鉴别诊断的初步经验
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2020 Jan;81(1):157-165. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2020.81.1.157. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
Mammography breast density: an effective supplemental modality for the precise grading of ultrasound BI-RADS 4 categories.乳腺钼靶密度:超声BI-RADS 4类精确分级的有效辅助手段。
Gland Surg. 2021 Jun;10(6):2010-2018. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-313.
7
Relationship between BI-RADS and the Results of the Wire-Guided Percutaneous Localization for Non-Palpable Breast Lesions.乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)与不可触及乳腺病变的导丝引导下经皮定位结果之间的关系
Spartan Med Res J. 2019 Jul 1;4(1):9061. doi: 10.51894/001c.9061.
8
Risk-predicted dual nomograms consisting of clinical and ultrasound factors for downgrading BI-RADS category 4a breast lesions - A multiple centre study.用于降低BI-RADS 4a类乳腺病变分类的由临床和超声因素组成的风险预测双列线图——一项多中心研究
J Cancer. 2021 Jan 1;12(1):292-304. doi: 10.7150/jca.51302. eCollection 2021.
9
Discrepancies between radiological and histological findings in preoperative core needle (CNB) and vacuum-assisted (VAB) breast biopsies.术前空心针(CNB)和真空辅助(VAB)乳腺活检的影像学和组织学检查结果差异。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;147(3):749-754. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03481-7. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
10
The role of tissue elasticity in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using shear wave elastography.剪切波弹性成像技术在鉴别良恶性乳腺病变中的组织弹性作用。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Sep 29;20(1):930. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07423-x.