Gaitini Diana, Beck-Razi Nira, Mor-Yosef David, Fischer Doron, Ben Itzhak Ofer, Krausz Michael M, Engel Ahuva
Department of Medical Imaging, Rambam Health Care Campus, POB 9602, Haifa 31906, Israel.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 May;190(5):1300-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2955.
The objective of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of color Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced MDCT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in adults and their utility as a triage tool in lower abdominal pain.
We reviewed the medical records of 420 consecutive adult patients, 271 women and 149 men, 18 years old or older, referred from the emergency department to sonography examination for clinically suspected acute appendicitis between January 2003 and June 2006. Patients underwent sonography of the right upper abdomen and pelvis followed by graded compression and color Doppler sonography of the right lower quadrant. CT was performed in 132 patients due to inconclusive sonography findings or a discrepancy between the clinical diagnosis and the sonography diagnosis. Sonography and CT reports were compared with surgery or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. Statistical analyses were performed by Pearson's chi-square test and cross-tabulation software.
Sonography and CT correctly diagnosed acute appendicitis in 66 of 75 patients and in 38 of 39 patients, respectively, and correctly denied acute appendicitis in 312 of 326 and in 92 of 92 patients. Sonography was inconclusive in 17 of 418 cases and CT, in one of 132 cases. Sonography and CT allowed alternative diagnoses in 82 and 42 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for sonography were 74.2%, 97%, 88%, 93%, and 92%, respectively, and for CT, 100%, 98.9%, 97.4%, 100%, and 99%.
Sonography should be the first imaging technique in adult patients for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and triage of acute abdominal pain. CT should be used as a complementary study for selected cases.
本研究的目的是评估彩色多普勒超声和对比增强MDCT在诊断成人急性阑尾炎中的准确性,以及它们作为下腹部疼痛分诊工具的效用。
我们回顾了2003年1月至2006年6月期间从急诊科转诊来进行超声检查的420例连续成年患者的病历,其中女性271例,男性149例,年龄在18岁及以上,临床上怀疑患有急性阑尾炎。患者先接受右上腹和骨盆的超声检查,然后对右下腹进行分级压迫和彩色多普勒超声检查。由于超声检查结果不明确或临床诊断与超声诊断存在差异,132例患者进行了CT检查。将超声和CT报告与手术或临床随访结果作为参考标准进行比较。采用Pearson卡方检验和交叉列表软件进行统计分析。
超声和CT分别在75例患者中的66例和39例患者中的38例中正确诊断出急性阑尾炎,在326例患者中的312例和92例患者中的92例中正确排除急性阑尾炎。在418例病例中,超声检查结果不明确的有17例,在132例病例中,CT检查结果不明确的有1例。超声和CT分别在82例和42例患者中做出了其他诊断。超声的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为74.2%、97%、88%、93%和92%,CT的分别为100%、98.9%、97.4%、100%和99%。
超声应作为诊断成人急性阑尾炎和分诊急性腹痛的首选成像技术。CT应作为特定病例的补充检查。