Suppr超能文献

嗜酸性粒细胞减少是入住医疗重症监护病房时脓毒症的可靠标志物。

Eosinopenia is a reliable marker of sepsis on admission to medical intensive care units.

作者信息

Abidi Khalid, Khoudri Ibtissam, Belayachi Jihane, Madani Naoufel, Zekraoui Aicha, Zeggwagh Amine Ali, Abouqal Redouane

机构信息

Medical Intensive Care Unit, Ibn Sina University Hospital, 10000, Rabat, Morocco.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R59. doi: 10.1186/cc6883. Epub 2008 Apr 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Eosinopenia is a cheap and forgotten marker of acute infection that has not been evaluated previously in intensive care units (ICUs). The aim of the present study was to test the value of eosinopenia in the diagnosis of sepsis in patients admitted to ICUs.

METHODS

A prospective study of consecutive adult patients admitted to a 12-bed medical ICU was performed. Eosinophils were measured at ICU admission. Two intensivists blinded to the eosinophils classified patients as negative or with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock.

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients were enrolled. In discriminating noninfected (negative + SIRS) and infected (sepsis + severe sepsis + septic shock) groups, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83 to 0.94). Eosinophils at <50 cells/mm3 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 71% to 86%), a specificity of 91% (95% CI, 79% to 96%), a positive likelihood ratio of 9.12 (95% CI, 3.9 to 21), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.21(95% CI, 0.15 to 0.31). In discriminating SIRS and infected groups, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.94). Eosinophils at <40 cells/mm3 yielded a sensitivity of 80% (95% CI, 71% to 86%), a specificity of 80% (95% CI, 55% to 93%), a positive likelihood ratio of 4 (95% CI, 1.65 to 9.65), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.25 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.36).

CONCLUSION

Eosinopenia is a good diagnostic marker in distinguishing between noninfection and infection, but is a moderate marker in discriminating between SIRS and infection in newly admitted critically ill patients. Eosinopenia may become a helpful clinical tool in ICU practices.

摘要

引言

嗜酸性粒细胞减少是一种廉价且被忽视的急性感染标志物,此前在重症监护病房(ICU)中尚未得到评估。本研究的目的是检验嗜酸性粒细胞减少在诊断入住ICU患者脓毒症中的价值。

方法

对一家拥有12张床位的内科ICU连续收治的成年患者进行前瞻性研究。在患者入住ICU时检测嗜酸性粒细胞。两名对嗜酸性粒细胞检测结果不知情的重症监护医生将患者分类为阴性或患有全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、脓毒症、严重脓毒症或感染性休克。

结果

共纳入177例患者。在区分未感染(阴性+SIRS)和感染(脓毒症+严重脓毒症+感染性休克)组时,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.89(95%置信区间(CI),0.83至0.94)。嗜酸性粒细胞计数<50个/立方毫米时,敏感性为80%(95%CI,71%至86%),特异性为91%(95%CI,79%至96%),阳性似然比为9.12(95%CI,3.9至21),阴性似然比为0.21(95%CI,0.15至0.31)。在区分SIRS和感染组时,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.84(95%CI,0.74至0.94)。嗜酸性粒细胞计数<40个/立方毫米时,敏感性为80%(95%CI,71%至86%),特异性为80%(95%CI,55%至93%),阳性似然比为4(95%CI,1.65至9.65),阴性似然比为0.25(95%CI,0.17至0.36)。

结论

嗜酸性粒细胞减少在区分未感染和感染方面是一个良好的诊断标志物,但在区分新入院重症患者的SIRS和感染方面是一个中等标志物。嗜酸性粒细胞减少可能成为ICU实践中的一种有用的临床工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/49a5/2447615/97e4e9c6b1cd/cc6883-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验