Isern A M, Fernández C, Salamanca M, Bianchi G, González H, Virgala M D, Garnica E, Vargas F, Monserat R, Fuentes D
Unidad de Ultrasonido y Servicio de Vías Digestivas del Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado.
G E N. 1991 Jan-Mar;45(1):1-8.
Evaluation of the fine needle aspiration cytology guided by ultrasonography in the diagnosis of abdominal and retroperitoneal tumors.
Transversal study of diagnostic standard-criterion test.
Ultrasonographic Unity Digestive Disease Department. Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado.
98 patients with intraabdominal and retroperitoneal lesions.
Fine needle aspiration cytology guided by Ultrasonography. INDICE TEST: Laparoscopy and/or laparotomy.
Estimation of sensibility (S), Specificity (E), Efficacy (Ef), positive predictive value (VPP), negative predictive value (VPN), measure of false positives (TFP) and measure of false negatives (TFN) by diagnosis method.
VP: 81%; VN: 12%; FP: 1%; FN: 6%; S: 93%; E: 92.3%; Ef.: 97%; VPP: 98.7%; VPN: 66%; TFP: 1.25%; Benign lesions: 22.5%; Malignancy lesions: 65.5%; non lesions: 12%; complications: severe: 1%, non significance: 5%.
Fine needle aspiration cytology guided by ultrasound has high sensibility, specificity, efficacy, with low value of false positive. However, it has high incidence of false negatives and negative predictive value. We recommend diagnostic procedures when the suspicion of tumor is high did the cytology is negative.
超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查在腹部及腹膜后肿瘤诊断中的评估。
诊断标准-标准试验的横向研究。
超声消化疾病科。马查多神父肿瘤医院。
98例腹内及腹膜后病变患者。
超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查。指标试验:腹腔镜检查和/或剖腹手术。
通过诊断方法评估敏感性(S)、特异性(E)、有效性(Ef)、阳性预测值(VPP)、阴性预测值(VPN)、假阳性测量值(TFP)和假阴性测量值(TFN)。
VP:81%;VN:12%;FP:1%;FN:6%;S:93%;E:92.3%;Ef:97%;VPP:98.7%;VPN:66%;TFP:1.25%;良性病变:22.5%;恶性病变:65.5%;无病变:12%;并发症:严重:1%,无显著性:5%。
超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查具有高敏感性、特异性、有效性,假阳性值低。然而,其假阴性发生率和阴性预测值较高。当肿瘤怀疑度高而细胞学检查为阴性时,我们建议进行诊断性操作。