Mason Jo, Khunti Kamlesh, Stone Margaret, Farooqi Azhar, Carr Sue
Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Jun;51(6):933-51. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.01.024. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
There is increasing evidence that educational interventions aimed at empowering patients are successful in chronic disease management. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of such educational interventions in people with kidney disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW: A comprehensive search strategy was applied by using major electronic databases from 1980 to March 2007. Researchers independently reviewed titles and abstracts and extracted data from identified studies.
SETTING & POPULATION: Patients in any of the following stages of chronic kidney disease: early, predialysis, and dialysis. Kidney transplant recipients were excluded because this group has additional educational needs that are beyond the scope of this review.
Randomized controlled trials.
Structured educational interventions (involving informational and psychological components) with usual care.
Clinical, behavioral, psychological, and knowledge outcomes were considered.
22 studies were identified involving a wide range of multicomponent interventions with variable aims and outcomes depending on the area of kidney disease care. 18 studies provided significant results for at least 1 of the outcomes. The majority of studies aimed to improve diet and/or fluid concordance in dialysis patients and involved short- and medium-term follow-up. A single major long-term study was a 20-year follow-up of a predialysis educational intervention that showed increased survival rates. No study was found that addressed chronic kidney disease at an earlier stage.
Meta-analysis was not possible because of study heterogeneity.
Multicomponent structured educational interventions were effective in predialysis and dialysis care, but the quality of many studies was suboptimal. Effective frameworks to develop, implement, and evaluate educational interventions are required, especially those that target patients with early stages of chronic kidney disease. This could lead to possible prevention or delay in progression of kidney disease.
越来越多的证据表明,旨在增强患者能力的教育干预措施在慢性病管理中取得了成功。我们的目的是对这类教育干预措施在肾病患者中的有效性进行系统评价。
采用综合检索策略,检索了1980年至2007年3月期间的主要电子数据库。研究人员独立审查标题和摘要,并从已识别的研究中提取数据。
处于慢性肾病以下任何阶段的患者:早期、透析前和透析期。肾移植受者被排除在外,因为该组有超出本评价范围的额外教育需求。
随机对照试验。
结构化教育干预措施(包括信息和心理成分)与常规护理相结合。
考虑临床、行为、心理和知识方面的结果。
共识别出22项研究,涉及范围广泛的多成分干预措施,其目标和结果因肾病护理领域而异。18项研究至少在1项结果上提供了显著结果。大多数研究旨在改善透析患者的饮食和/或液体依从性,并涉及短期和中期随访。一项主要的长期研究是对透析前教育干预措施进行的20年随访,结果显示生存率有所提高。未发现有研究针对更早阶段的慢性肾病。
由于研究的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。
多成分结构化教育干预措施在透析前和透析护理中是有效的,但许多研究的质量欠佳。需要有效的框架来开发、实施和评估教育干预措施,尤其是针对慢性肾病早期患者的措施。这可能会预防或延缓肾病的进展。