Spaan Suzanne, Doekes Gert, Heederik Dick, Thorne Peter S, Wouters Inge M
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Environmental Epidemiology Division, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80178, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;74(12):3804-11. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02537-07. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
The measurement of airborne endotoxins is thus far not standardized. Earlier studies reported higher endotoxin yields when Tween 20 was added to the media used for filter extraction and in the Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. This study compared four common media and assessed the effects of Tween during extraction and analysis separately. Parallel airborne dust samples from five work environments (n = 250) were used to compare the four media (pyrogen-free water [PFW], PFW-Tween 20, PFW-Tris, and PFW-triethylamine-phosphate [TAP]) and an extraction time of 10 or 60 min. A subset of the extracts in PFW or PFW-Tween (n = 40) were analyzed in parallel LAL assays with PFW or PFW-Tween as the assay medium. The results produced by a shorter extraction time or the presence of Tris were similar to the results for the reference procedure (PFW and 60 min of shaking). The use of PFW-TAP showed overall lower yields and a deviant calibration curve. The presence of Tween in the extraction medium resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) higher endotoxin yields from all dust types, independent of the effect of Tween in the assay. Tween in the LAL assay, however, also strongly inhibited the reactivity of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) standard, thus shifting the calibration curve to higher values. The inhibition of LPS in test samples was less pronounced and varied between dust sources, resulting in enhanced calculated concentrations. This assay effect could be circumvented by diluting extracts at least 50-fold before the LAL assay. In conclusion, of the media tested, only Tween enhances the efficiency of endotoxin extraction from airborne dust samples in a consistent manner. We recommend extraction in PFW-Tween combined with dilution and LAL analysis in PFW.
迄今为止,空气中内毒素的测量尚未标准化。早期研究报告称,在用于过滤器提取的培养基以及鲎试剂检测中添加吐温20时,内毒素产量更高。本研究比较了四种常用培养基,并分别评估了提取和分析过程中吐温的影响。使用来自五个工作环境的平行空气尘埃样本(n = 250)来比较四种培养基(无热原水[PFW]、PFW - 吐温20、PFW - 三羟甲基氨基甲烷[Tris]和PFW - 磷酸三乙胺[TAP])以及10分钟或60分钟的提取时间。以PFW或PFW - 吐温作为检测培养基,对PFW或PFW - 吐温中的一部分提取物(n = 40)进行平行鲎试剂检测分析。较短提取时间或存在Tris所产生的结果与参考程序(PFW和60分钟振荡)的结果相似。使用PFW - TAP显示总体产量较低且校准曲线异常。提取培养基中存在吐温会导致所有尘埃类型的内毒素产量显著(P < 0.05)更高,这与检测中吐温的影响无关。然而,鲎试剂检测中的吐温也强烈抑制脂多糖(LPS)标准品的反应性,从而使校准曲线向更高值偏移。测试样品中LPS的抑制作用不太明显,并且在不同尘埃来源之间有所变化,导致计算浓度升高。通过在鲎试剂检测前将提取物至少稀释50倍,可以避免这种检测效应。总之,在所测试的培养基中,只有吐温能以一致的方式提高从空气尘埃样本中提取内毒素的效率。我们建议在PFW - 吐温中进行提取,并结合在PFW中稀释和鲎试剂分析。