Fernández M, Chesta J, Jirón M I, Mánquez P, Brahm J
Instituto de Radiología, Unidad de Radiología Clínica Las Condes, Hospital Clínico de la Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile.
Rev Med Chil. 1991 May;119(5):524-9.
Doppler-duplex has been widely used to quantify blood flow. Nevertheless, its usefulness in assessing portal vein flow (PVF) has been questioned due to technical problems: vessel cross sectional area measurements, interobserver variability, and PVF changes related to physiological events. This study was aimed to measure PVF in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, to estimate changes in PVF during the respiratory cycle, and to evaluate intraobserver variability of Doppler-duplex technique. Twenty-two patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension and 22 healthy subjects were included. One operator made 6 measurements of portal vein diameter (D) and mean flow velocity in inspiration and aspiration. Area of the vessel (A) and PVF were calculated by a microprocessor. Interobserver variability was estimated for each subject and a mean was determined for each group. In the control group, PVF was 901 +/- 39 ml/min in inspiration and 633 +/- 38 ml/min in aspiration; p < 0.001. In patients with cirrhosis PVF was 1303 +/- 121 ml/min in inspiration and 1003 +/- 96 ml/min in aspiration; p < 0.001. Intraobserver variability was 6.0 +/- 0.6% for D, 12.0 +/- 3% for MV and 18.3 +/- 1.6% for PVF in healthy subjects and 5.3 +/- 0.7% for D, 9.2 +/- 0.9% for MV and 15.2 +/- 1.5% for PVF in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. In conclusion, PVF is significantly increased in cirrhotics. PVF was higher in inspiration than espiration in both groups. The Doppler-duplex method evaluation of PVF has an important intraobserver variability (18.3 +/- 1.6%). Then, changes in PVF less than 20% are not accurately measured by this technique.
多普勒双功超声已被广泛用于量化血流。然而,由于技术问题,其在评估门静脉血流(PVF)方面的实用性受到质疑:血管横截面积测量、观察者间差异以及与生理事件相关的PVF变化。本研究旨在测量肝硬化和门静脉高压患者的PVF,估计呼吸周期中PVF的变化,并评估多普勒双功超声技术的观察者内差异。纳入了22例肝硬化和门静脉高压患者以及22例健康受试者。一名操作人员在吸气和呼气时对门静脉直径(D)和平均流速进行了6次测量。通过微处理器计算血管面积(A)和PVF。估计每个受试者的观察者间差异,并确定每组的平均值。在对照组中,吸气时PVF为901±39 ml/min,呼气时为633±38 ml/min;p<0.001。肝硬化患者吸气时PVF为1303±121 ml/min,呼气时为1003±96 ml/min;p<0.001。健康受试者中,观察者内差异D为6.0±0.6%,MV为12.0±3%,PVF为18.3±1.6%;肝硬化和门静脉高压患者中,D为5.3±0.7%,MV为9.2±0.9%,PVF为15.2±1.5%。总之,肝硬化患者的PVF显著增加。两组吸气时的PVF均高于呼气时。PVF的多普勒双功超声方法评估存在重要的观察者内差异(18.3±1.6%)。因此,该技术无法准确测量PVF小于20%的变化。