Natanson Charles, Kern Steven J, Lurie Peter, Banks Steven M, Wolfe Sidney M
Critical Care Medicine Department, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2304-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.jrv80007. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes (HBBSs) are infusible oxygen-carrying liquids that have long shelf lives, have no need for refrigeration or cross-matching, and are ideal for treating hemorrhagic shock in remote settings. Some trials of HBBSs during the last decade have reported increased risks without clinical benefit.
To assess the safety of HBBSs in surgical, stroke, and trauma patients.
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library searches for articles using hemoglobin and blood substitutes from 1980 through March 25, 2008; reviews of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee meeting materials; and Internet searches for company press releases.
Randomized controlled trials including patients aged 19 years and older receiving HBBSs therapeutically. The database searches yielded 70 trials of which 13 met these criteria; in addition, data from 2 other trials were reported in 2 press releases, and additional data were included in 1 relevant FDA review.
Data on death and myocardial infarction (MI) as outcome variables.
Sixteen trials involving 5 different products and 3711 patients in varied patient populations were identified. A test for heterogeneity of the results of these trials was not significant for either mortality or MI (for both, I2 = 0%, P > or = .60), and data were combined using a fixed-effects model. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the risk of death (164 deaths in the HBBS-treated groups and 123 deaths in the control groups; relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.61) and risk of MI (59 MIs in the HBBS-treated groups and 16 MIs in the control groups; RR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.67-4.40) with these HBBSs. Subgroup analysis of these trials indicated the increased risk was not restricted to a particular HBBS or clinical indication.
Based on the available data, use of HBBSs is associated with a significantly increased risk of death and MI.
基于血红蛋白的血液替代品(HBBSs)是可输注的携氧液体,具有较长的保质期,无需冷藏或交叉配血,是治疗偏远地区失血性休克的理想选择。在过去十年中,一些关于HBBSs的试验报告称风险增加但无临床益处。
评估HBBSs在手术、中风和创伤患者中的安全性。
通过PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆检索1980年至2008年3月25日期间使用血红蛋白和血液替代品的文章;审查食品药品监督管理局(FDA)咨询委员会会议材料;并在互联网上搜索公司新闻稿。
随机对照试验,纳入年龄在19岁及以上接受HBBSs治疗的患者。数据库检索产生了70项试验,其中13项符合这些标准;此外,2份新闻稿中报告了另外2项试验的数据,1份相关的FDA审查中纳入了其他数据。
将死亡和心肌梗死(MI)数据作为结局变量。
确定了16项试验,涉及5种不同产品和3711名不同患者群体的患者。这些试验结果的异质性检验在死亡率或MI方面均无显著性(两者的I2 = 0%,P≥0.60),数据采用固定效应模型合并。总体而言,使用这些HBBSs会使死亡风险(HBBS治疗组164例死亡,对照组为123例死亡;相对风险[RR],1.30;95%置信区间[CI],1.05 - 1.61)和MI风险(HBBS治疗组59例MI,对照组16例MI;RR,2.71;95% CI,1.67 - 4.40)有统计学意义的增加。
根据现有数据,使用HBBSs与死亡和MI风险显著增加相关。