• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本抗癌药物的研发现状。

Current status of development of anticancer agents in Japan.

作者信息

Morita Tomohiro, Hori Akiko, Narimatatsu Hiroto, Tanimoto Tetsuya, Kami Masahiro

机构信息

Division of Exploratory Research, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8639, Japan.

First Outpatient Division, The National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Hematol. 2008 Jun;87(5):484-489. doi: 10.1007/s12185-008-0087-2. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

DOI:10.1007/s12185-008-0087-2
PMID:18443741
Abstract

To investigate the current status of the development of anticancer agents in Japan, we examined the number of these agents developed after 1999, their target diseases, and the association between the number of approved agents and the number of patients with the diseases. The data were obtained via the Internet. Of the 487 agents approved from 1999 to April 2007, 84 were anticancer drugs. Of these 84, 46 were approved based on clinical trials and 38 were approved through the new drug application for off-label usages without clinical trials. The target diseases of the 46 agents approved through clinical trials were nonhematologic tumors in 29, hematologic malignancies in 13, and others in 4. Of the 38 approved through the new drug application for off-label usages, 31 were for nonhematologic tumors and 7 for hematologic malignancies. The number of approved anticancer agents for hematologic malignancies per unit patient population was 6.5-times as many as that for nonhematologic tumors. This study demonstrated that the situation regarding the development of anticancer agents differs among tumor types. The majority of anticancer agents developed target hematologic malignancies, while the newly developed anticancer agents have affected treatment strategies for solid tumors.

摘要

为了调查日本抗癌药物的研发现状,我们研究了1999年后研发的此类药物数量、其靶向疾病,以及获批药物数量与患病人数之间的关联。数据通过互联网获取。在1999年至2007年4月获批的487种药物中,有84种是抗癌药物。在这84种药物中,46种是基于临床试验获批的,38种是通过新药申请获批用于未进行临床试验的非标签用途。通过临床试验获批的46种药物的靶向疾病中,29种是非血液系统肿瘤,13种是血液系统恶性肿瘤,4种是其他疾病。在通过新药申请获批用于非标签用途的38种药物中,31种用于非血液系统肿瘤,7种用于血液系统恶性肿瘤。每单位患者群体中获批的血液系统恶性肿瘤抗癌药物数量是非血液系统肿瘤的6.5倍。这项研究表明,抗癌药物的研发情况因肿瘤类型而异。大多数研发的抗癌药物靶向血液系统恶性肿瘤,而新研发的抗癌药物已经影响了实体瘤的治疗策略。

相似文献

1
Current status of development of anticancer agents in Japan.日本抗癌药物的研发现状。
Int J Hematol. 2008 Jun;87(5):484-489. doi: 10.1007/s12185-008-0087-2. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
2
Comprehensive analysis of clinical development and regulatory submission promotion schemes for oncologic drugs as the Japanese national projects.作为日本国家项目的肿瘤药物临床开发与监管申报促进计划的综合分析
Invest New Drugs. 2016 Dec;34(6):777-791. doi: 10.1007/s10637-016-0380-5. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
3
Anticancer drug development from traditional cytotoxic to targeted therapies: evidence of shorter drug research and development time, and shorter drug lag in Japan.从传统细胞毒性药物到靶向治疗的抗癌药物开发:日本的药物研发时间更短,药物滞后时间更短的证据。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Oct;37(5):547-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2012.01332.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
4
The drug lag and associated factors for orphan anticancer drugs in Japan compared to the United States.日本与美国的孤儿抗癌药物的药物研发滞后及其相关因素比较。
Invest New Drugs. 2019 Oct;37(5):1086-1093. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0612-y. Epub 2018 May 31.
5
A Qualitative Study on the Differences Between Trial Populations and the Approved Therapeutic Indications of Antineoplastic Agents by 3 Regulatory Agencies From 2010 to 2018.一项关于 2010 年至 2018 年间 3 个监管机构的抗肿瘤药物试验人群与批准治疗适应证之间差异的定性研究。
Clin Ther. 2020 Feb;42(2):305-320.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
Drug approval delays in hematologic malignancies between Europe and the US and between Japan and the US: a clinical perspective.血液系统恶性肿瘤在欧美和欧美日之间的药物审批延迟:临床视角。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023 Dec 7;53(12):1125-1129. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad117.
7
[Current status and problems in clinical trial for new anticancer drug in Japan].[日本新型抗癌药物临床试验的现状与问题]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 1996 Jan;23(2):141-5.
8
Erlotinib: CP 358774, NSC 718781, OSI 774, R 1415.厄洛替尼:CP 358774、NSC 718781、OSI 774、R 1415。
Drugs R D. 2003;4(4):243-8. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200304040-00006.
9
Assessment of Drugs Approved by Public Knowledge-Based Applications (Kouchi-shinsei) During the Last Two Decades in Japan.评估过去二十年在日本由公共知识型应用程序(Kouchi-shinsei)批准的药物。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Oct;110(4):1127-1135. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2332. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Post-marketing research and its outcome for novel anticancer agents approved by both the FDA and EMA between 2005 and 2010: A cross-sectional study.2005年至2010年间获美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的新型抗癌药物的上市后研究及其结果:一项横断面研究。
Int J Cancer. 2018 Jan 15;142(2):414-423. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31061. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulating off-label drug use in India: The arena for concern.规范印度的药品非标签使用:令人担忧的领域。
Perspect Clin Res. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):129-33. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.159935.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative debate on the various anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs: pegaptanib sodium (Macugen), ranibizumab (Lucentis) and bevacizumab (Avastin).关于各种抗血管内皮生长因子药物的比较性辩论:培加替尼钠(Macugen)、雷珠单抗(Lucentis)和贝伐单抗(Avastin)。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov-Dec;55(6):437-9. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.36478.
2
Emerging drugs for non-small-cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌的新型药物
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2007 Sep;12(3):449-60. doi: 10.1517/14728214.12.3.449.
3
Sorafenib: delivering a targeted drug to the right targets.
索拉非尼:将靶向药物送达正确靶点。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007 May;7(5):617-26. doi: 10.1586/14737140.7.5.617.
4
Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: from cytotoxic agents to molecular agents and multitargeted strategies.转移性结直肠癌的治疗:从细胞毒性药物到分子药物及多靶点策略
Oncology (Williston Park). 2006 Dec;20(14 Suppl 10):11-9.
5
[Review process of anticancer drugs in Japan].[日本抗癌药物的审评流程]
Rinsho Ketsueki. 2006 Jul;47(7):626-32.
6
Reimbursement for cancer treatment: coverage of off-label drug indications.癌症治疗费用报销:未获批药物适应症的覆盖范围。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3206-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8940. Epub 2006 May 22.
7
Unconventional anticancer agents: a systematic review of clinical trials.非传统抗癌药物:临床试验的系统评价
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 1;24(1):136-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.8406.
8
Effect of off-label use of oncology drugs on pharmaceutical costs: the rituximab experience.肿瘤药物标签外使用对药品成本的影响:利妥昔单抗的经验
Am J Manag Care. 2003 May;9(5):393-400; quiz 401-2.
9
Oncology drug clinical development and approval in Japan: the role of the pharmaceuticals and medical devices evaluation center (PMDEC).日本肿瘤药物的临床开发与审批:药品和医疗器械评估中心(PMDEC)的作用
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002 May;42(2):145-55. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(02)00010-0.