Suppr超能文献

把握未来事件:对视觉反馈可用性的明确认知无法可靠地影响抓握动作。

Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension.

作者信息

Whitwell Robert L, Lambert Lisa M, Goodale Melvyn A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Social Science Building, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5C2, Canada.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jul;188(4):603-11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1395-8. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

Abstract

We examined whether or not conscious knowledge about the availability of visual feedback on an upcoming trial would influence the programming of a precision grip. Twenty healthy volunteers were asked to reach out and grasp objects under two viewing conditions: full visual feedback (closed loop) or no visual feedback (open loop). The two viewing conditions were presented in blocked, randomized, and alternating trial orders. Before each block of trials, participants were explicitly informed of the nature of the upcoming order of viewing conditions. Even though participants continued to scale their grip to the size of the goal objects which varied in size and distance, they opened their hand significantly wider when visual feedback was not available during movement execution. This difference was evident before peak grip aperture was reached, continued into the grip aperture closing phase, and presumably reflects the visuomotor system's ability to build in a margin of error to compensate for the absence of visual feedback. The difference in grip aperture between closed- and open-loop trials increased as a function of distance, which suggests that the visuomotor system can make use of visual feedback given enough time, even when that feedback is not anticipated. The difference in grip aperture between closed- and open-loop trials was larger when the two visual feedback conditions were blocked than when they were either randomized or alternated. Importantly, performance did not differ between the randomized and the alternating trial blocks. In other words, despite knowledge of the availability of visual feedback on an upcoming trial in the predictable alternating block, participants behaved no differently than they did on randomized trials. Taken together, these results suggest that motor planning tends to optimize performance largely on the basis of what has happened regularly in the past and cannot take full advantage of conscious knowledge of what will happen on a future occasion.

摘要

我们研究了对即将到来的试验中视觉反馈可用性的有意识认知是否会影响精确抓握的编程。20名健康志愿者被要求在两种视觉条件下伸手抓取物体:完全视觉反馈(闭环)或无视觉反馈(开环)。这两种视觉条件以分块、随机和交替的试验顺序呈现。在每块试验之前,明确告知参与者即将到来的视觉条件顺序的性质。尽管参与者继续根据目标物体的大小和距离调整抓握力度,但在运动执行过程中没有视觉反馈时,他们会显著更宽地张开手。这种差异在达到抓握孔径峰值之前就很明显,并持续到抓握孔径闭合阶段,大概反映了视觉运动系统在没有视觉反馈时内置误差余量以进行补偿的能力。闭环和开环试验之间抓握孔径的差异随着距离的增加而增大,这表明即使没有预期到视觉反馈,只要有足够的时间,视觉运动系统也可以利用视觉反馈。当两种视觉反馈条件分块呈现时,闭环和开环试验之间抓握孔径的差异比随机或交替呈现时更大。重要的是,随机试验块和交替试验块之间的表现没有差异。换句话说,尽管在可预测的交替块中知道即将到来的试验中有视觉反馈的可用性,但参与者的行为与随机试验时没有不同。综上所述,这些结果表明运动规划倾向于主要根据过去经常发生的情况来优化表现,而不能充分利用对未来情况的有意识认知。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验