Madjidian Josefin A, Morales Carolina L, Smith Henrik G
Department of Ecology, Plant Ecology and Systematics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Oecologia. 2008 Jul;156(4):835-45. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1039-5. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
Biological invasions might constitute a major threat to mutualisms. Introduced pollinators might competitively displace their native counterparts, which in turn affects the pollination of native plants, if native and alien visitors differ in pollinator effectiveness. Since its invasion in 1994 into south-west Argentina, the introduced European bumblebee Bombus ruderatus has continuously increased in abundance, along with a simultaneous decrease in the abundance of the native Bombus dahlbomii. The latter is the only native bumblebee species of the temperate forests of southern South America, and the main pollinator of the endemic herb Alstroemeria aurea. In order to evaluate the impact of the ongoing displacement of the native by the alien bumblebee, we compared the pollinator effectiveness (i.e., the combination of pollinator efficiency per visit and visitation frequency) between both bumblebee species, as well as related pollinator traits that might account for potential differences in pollinator efficiency. Native Bombus dahlbomii, which has a larger body and spent more time per flower, was the more efficient pollinator compared to Bombus ruderatus, both in terms of quantity and quality of pollen deposited per visit. However, Bombus ruderatus was a much more frequent flower visitor than Bombus dahlbomii. As a consequence, Bombus ruderatus is nowadays a more effective pollinator of A. aurea than its native congener. Despite the lack of evidence of an increase in seed set at the population level, comparisons with historical records of Bombus dahlbomii abundances prior to Bombus ruderatus' invasion suggest that the overall pollination intensity of A. aurea might in fact have risen as a consequence of this invasion. Field experiments like these, that incorporate the natural variation in abundance of native and alien species, are powerful means to demonstrate that the consequences of invasions are more complex than previous manipulated and controlled experiments have suggested.
生物入侵可能对互利共生关系构成重大威胁。外来传粉者可能会通过竞争取代本地传粉者,如果本地和外来访客在传粉效率上存在差异,这反过来又会影响本地植物的授粉。自1994年入侵阿根廷西南部以来,引入的欧洲熊蜂红尾熊蜂(Bombus ruderatus)数量持续增加,与此同时,本地的达尔氏熊蜂(Bombus dahlbomii)数量却在减少。后者是南美洲南部温带森林中唯一的本地熊蜂物种,也是特有草本植物金黄六出花(Alstroemeria aurea)的主要传粉者。为了评估外来熊蜂持续取代本地熊蜂所产生的影响,我们比较了两种熊蜂的传粉效率(即每次访问的传粉效率与访问频率的综合),以及可能导致传粉效率潜在差异的相关传粉者特征。本地的达尔氏熊蜂体型较大,在每朵花上花费的时间更多,与红尾熊蜂相比,无论是每次访问所携带花粉的数量还是质量,它都是更高效的传粉者。然而,红尾熊蜂的访花频率比达尔氏熊蜂高得多。因此,如今红尾熊蜂对金黄六出花的传粉效果比其本地同类更有效。尽管缺乏在种群水平上结实率增加的证据,但与红尾熊蜂入侵前达尔氏熊蜂数量的历史记录相比,表明金黄六出花的总体授粉强度实际上可能因这次入侵而有所提高。像这样纳入本地和外来物种数量自然变化的野外实验,是有力的手段,可证明入侵的后果比以往的人工控制实验所表明的更为复杂。