Suppr超能文献

未分割资源的冲突可能解释物种间衰退差异:人为竞争假说。

Conflict over non-partitioned resources may explain between-species differences in declines: the anthropogenic competition hypothesis.

作者信息

Higginson Andrew D

机构信息

Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG UK.

出版信息

Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2017;71(7):99. doi: 10.1007/s00265-017-2327-z. Epub 2017 Jun 10.

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Human alterations of habitats are causing declines in many species worldwide. The extent of declines varies greatly among closely related species, for often unknown reasons that must be understood in order to maintain biodiversity. An overlooked factor is that seasonally breeding species compete for nest sites, which are increasingly limited in many anthropogenically degraded environments. I used evolutionary game theory to predict the outcome of competition between individuals that differ in their competitive ability and timing of nesting. A range of species following evolutionarily stable strategies can co-exist when there are sufficient nest sites, but my model predicts that a reduction in nest site availability has greater impacts on late-nesting species, especially the stronger competitors, whereas early-nesting, stronger species decline only slightly. These predictions are supported by data on 221 bird and 43 bumblebee species worldwide. Restoration and provision of nest sites should be an urgent priority in conservation efforts. More broadly, these results indicate a new ecological principle of potentially widespread importance: rapid reductions in the abundance of resources for which species' preferences have not diversified will result in unprecedented conflicts that reduce the potential for species co-existence.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Understanding the causes of species declines is crucial to preventing the losses. Whilst much work on species vulnerability shows broad scale effects, an enduring mystery is the variation in population trends between closely related species. I combined evolutionary modelling with three global-scale long-term data sets to reveal that competition for scarce nest sites causes variation in declines. The impact of the loss of nest sites on differential declines among closely related species from very different taxa indicates a new ecological principle of widespread importance: the effect of habitat degradation on competition among species. A lack of differentiation of nest site preferences means that-now nest sites are more limited-some species may be driving others to extinction. This phenomenon is likely to occur for any other non-partitioned resources that rapidly, on an evolutionary timescale, are now limiting population sizes.

摘要

摘要

人类对栖息地的改变正导致全球许多物种数量减少。物种数量减少的程度在亲缘关系密切的物种间差异很大,原因通常不明,而要维护生物多样性就必须了解这些原因。一个被忽视的因素是,季节性繁殖的物种会争夺巢穴,在许多人为退化的环境中,巢穴越来越有限。我运用进化博弈论预测了竞争能力和筑巢时间不同的个体之间的竞争结果。当有足够的巢穴时,一系列遵循进化稳定策略的物种能够共存,但我的模型预测,巢穴可用性的降低对晚筑巢物种影响更大,尤其是较强的竞争者,而早筑巢的较强物种数量只会略有下降。全球221种鸟类和43种大黄蜂物种的数据支持了这些预测。在保护工作中,恢复和提供巢穴应成为当务之急。更广泛地说,这些结果表明了一个可能具有广泛重要性的新生态原则:物种偏好尚未多样化的资源数量迅速减少将导致前所未有的冲突,从而降低物种共存的可能性。

意义声明

了解物种数量减少的原因对于防止物种损失至关重要。虽然许多关于物种脆弱性的研究显示了广泛的影响,但一个长期存在的谜团是亲缘关系密切的物种之间种群趋势的差异。我将进化建模与三个全球范围的长期数据集相结合,以揭示对稀缺巢穴的竞争导致了数量减少的差异。巢穴丧失对来自非常不同分类群的亲缘关系密切的物种间数量差异减少的影响表明了一个具有广泛重要性的新生态原则:栖息地退化对物种间竞争的影响。巢穴偏好缺乏分化意味着——现在巢穴更加有限——一些物种可能正驱使其他物种走向灭绝。对于任何其他在进化时间尺度上迅速变得有限、从而限制种群规模的未分化资源,这种现象都可能发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cb2/5486810/bac619ae8840/265_2017_2327_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验