Tomás M, Ortega P, Mensa J, García Ja, Barberán J
Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial.
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2008 Mar;21(1):45-59.
The publication of different studies, articles and documents over recent years greatly justifies the revision of the year 2003 Consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of rhinosinusitis made jointly by the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy and the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and Cervical Facial Pathology. The most significant features to be analyzed consider a new classification, the accumulated evidence on the role of first line of nasal corticosteroids, the demonstration of the utility of different antimicrobial agents with wide clinical experiences and the appearance of clinical studies with new antimicrobial agents that support their utility. Due to its evolution, rhinosinusitis is considered to be acute (viral or non-viral origin) if it lasts less than 12 weeks, chronic when it exceeds this time period and recurrent acute when three or more acute episodes are suffered in one year. Based on its severity, rhinosinusitis can be classified as mild, moderate or severe. Rhinosinusitis may present without or with complications. Rhinosinusitis symptoms resolve spontaneously in 40% of the patients. However, medical treatment is indicated to provide symptomatic relief, accelerate the resolution of the clinical picture, prevent possible complications and avoid evolution to chronicity. Antimicrobial agents and topical nasal corticosteroids (used alone or in combination with antimicrobial agents) are the treatments that have demonstrated therapeutical utility in rigorous and controlled clinical trials. In mild acute maxillary rhinosinusitis without previous antibiotic treatment, the treatment of choice is amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefditoren, while when it is moderate or mild in patients previously treated with antibiotics, levofloxacin or moxifloxacin are preferable, the amoxicillin/clavulanate or cefditoren drugs remaining as good alternatives. In the severe forms, third generation cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime or ceftriaxone, are indicated and amoxicillin/clavulanate or ertapenem are good options in the non-polypoidal chronic forms.
近年来,不同研究、文章和文献的发表充分证明有必要对2003年由西班牙化疗学会、西班牙耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会联合制定的鼻窦炎诊断与治疗共识进行修订。需要分析的最重要特征包括新的分类、鼻用糖皮质激素一线治疗作用的累积证据、具有广泛临床经验的不同抗菌药物效用的证明以及支持新抗菌药物效用的临床研究的出现。由于鼻窦炎的演变,如果病程持续少于12周则被认为是急性(病毒或非病毒起源),超过此时间段则为慢性,一年内出现三次或更多急性发作则为复发性急性。根据严重程度,鼻窦炎可分为轻度、中度或重度。鼻窦炎可能无并发症或伴有并发症。40%的患者鼻窦炎症状可自行缓解。然而,仍需药物治疗以缓解症状、加速临床症状的消退、预防可能的并发症并避免发展为慢性。抗菌药物和鼻用局部糖皮质激素(单独使用或与抗菌药物联合使用)是在严格对照临床试验中已证明具有治疗效用的治疗方法。在未接受过抗生素治疗的轻度急性上颌窦炎中,首选治疗药物是阿莫西林/克拉维酸或头孢妥仑,而在先前接受过抗生素治疗的患者中,如果病情为中度或轻度,左氧氟沙星或莫西沙星更可取,阿莫西林/克拉维酸或头孢妥仑仍是不错的选择。对于严重类型,可使用第三代头孢菌素,如头孢噻肟或头孢曲松,在非息肉性慢性鼻窦炎中,阿莫西林/克拉维酸或厄他培南是不错的选择。