• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“匿名暴食者互助会”初级教育材料的阅读水平

Reading level of Overeaters Anonymous primary educational material.

作者信息

Walfish Steven, Pinholster Katherine

机构信息

Independent Practice, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Eat Disord. 2008 May-Jun;16(3):212-6. doi: 10.1080/10640260802016720.

DOI:10.1080/10640260802016720
PMID:18443979
Abstract

Educational materials are often a key component of recovery in a mutual-help group. However, in order to be helpful to a maximum number of members, these materials must be presented at a reading level that is comprehensible. Two measures of readability, The Flesch Reading Ease score and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade-Level score were applied to 20 random paragraphs chosen from The Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions of Overeaters Anonymous. Results indicate that the average paragraph is written just below the tenth grade level and close to an optimum level of reading ease. However, due to variability, almost half (45%) of the paragraphs fell in the category of Difficult Reading Ease and half were found to be at a tenth grade reading level or beyond. In order to maximize the utility of this educational text, it is recommended that future editions take into consideration principles of readability.

摘要

教育材料通常是互助小组康复过程中的关键组成部分。然而,为了对尽可能多的成员有所帮助,这些材料必须以易于理解的阅读水平呈现。将两种可读性衡量标准,即弗莱什易读性分数和弗莱什-金凯德年级水平分数,应用于从《匿名暴饮暴食者十二步与十二传统》中随机选取的20个段落。结果表明,平均段落的写作水平略低于十年级,接近最佳易读水平。然而,由于存在变异性,几乎一半(45%)的段落属于难读易读类别,另一半则被发现处于十年级或更高的阅读水平。为了最大限度地提高这本教育文本的实用性,建议未来版本考虑可读性原则。

相似文献

1
Reading level of Overeaters Anonymous primary educational material.“匿名暴食者互助会”初级教育材料的阅读水平
Eat Disord. 2008 May-Jun;16(3):212-6. doi: 10.1080/10640260802016720.
2
Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.美国儿科学会牙科患者教育材料的可读性。
Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):431-5.
3
Readability Levels of Dental Patient Education Brochures.牙科患者教育手册的可读性水平。
J Dent Hyg. 2016 Feb;90(1):28-34.
4
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
5
Readability levels of individualized family service plans.个体家庭服务计划的可读性水平。
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2010 Aug;30(3):248-58. doi: 10.3109/01942631003780869.
6
Analysis of patient information leaflets provided by a district general hospital by the Flesch and Flesch-Kincaid method.采用 Flesch 和 Flesch-Kincaid 方法分析区综合医院提供的患者信息传单。
Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;64(13):1824-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02408.x.
7
Readability of educational materials for endodontic patients.牙髓病患者教育材料的可读性。
J Endod. 2010 Oct;36(10):1703-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.07.005.
8
Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.基于互联网的乳腺癌筛查乳腺X线摄影相关患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Acad Radiol. 2015 Mar;22(3):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.10.009. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
9
Readability and suitability assessment of patient education materials in rheumatic diseases.风湿性疾病患者教育材料的可读性和适宜性评估。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 Oct;65(10):1702-6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22046.
10
Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.骨科网站上肩部和肘部患者教育材料的可读性比较
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2015 Dec;73(4):249-56.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability and comprehension of self-report binge eating measures.自陈式暴食测量的可读性和理解度。
Eat Behav. 2013 Apr;14(2):167-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Feb 26.