Huey Stanley J, Polo Antonio J
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008 Jan;37(1):262-301. doi: 10.1080/15374410701820174.
This article reviews research on evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for ethnic minority youth using criteria from Chambless et al. (1998), Chambless et al. (1996), and Chambless and Hollon (1998). Although no well-established treatments were identified, probably efficacious or possibly efficacious treatments were found for ethnic minority youth with anxiety-related problems, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, conduct problems, substance use problems, trauma-related syndromes, and other clinical problems. In addition, all studies met either Nathan and Gorman's (2002) Type 1 or Type 2 methodological criteria. A brief meta-analysis showed overall treatment effects of medium magnitude (d = .44). Effects were larger when EBTs were compared to no treatment (d = .58) or psychological placebos (d = .51) versus treatment as usual (d = .22). Youth ethnicity (African American, Latino, mixed/other minority), problem type, clinical severity, diagnostic status, and culture-responsive treatment status did not moderate treatment outcome. Most studies had low statistical power and poor representation of less acculturated youth. Few tests of cultural adaptation effects have been conducted in the literature and culturally validated outcome measures are mostly lacking. Recommendations for clinical practice and future research directions are provided.
本文使用钱布利斯等人(1998年)、钱布利斯等人(1996年)以及钱布利斯和霍伦(1998年)的标准,回顾了针对少数族裔青少年的循证治疗(EBTs)研究。尽管未发现已确立的治疗方法,但对于患有焦虑相关问题、注意力缺陷/多动障碍、抑郁症、行为问题、物质使用问题、创伤相关综合征及其他临床问题的少数族裔青少年,发现了可能有效的或有可能有效的治疗方法。此外,所有研究均符合内森和戈尔曼(2002年)的1型或2型方法学标准。一项简短的荟萃分析显示总体治疗效果中等(d = 0.44)。与不治疗(d = 0.58)或心理安慰剂(d = 0.51)相比,EBTs与常规治疗(d = 0.22)相比效果更大。青少年种族(非裔美国人、拉丁裔、混合/其他少数族裔)、问题类型、临床严重程度、诊断状况及文化适应性治疗状况并未调节治疗结果。大多数研究的统计效力较低,对文化适应程度较低的青少年代表性不足。文献中很少进行文化适应效果测试,且大多缺乏经过文化验证的结果测量方法。本文还提供了临床实践建议和未来研究方向。