Suppr超能文献

医院工作人员两种自我报告的体力工作需求测量方法的比较:一项横断面研究。

Comparison of two self-reported measures of physical work demands in hospital personnel: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Nabe-Nielsen Kirsten, Fallentin Nils, Christensen Karl B, Jensen Jette N, Diderichsen Finn

机构信息

The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Apr 29;9:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-61.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is a frequent health complaint among health care personnel. Several work tasks and working postures are associated with an increased risk of LBP. The aim of this study was to compare two self-reported measures of physical demands and their association with LBP (the daily number of patient handling tasks and Hollmann's physical load index).

METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed to 535 hospital employees in a psychiatric and an orthopedic ward in a Danish hospital. Of these 411 (77%) filled in and returned the questionnaire. Only the 373 respondents who had non-missing values on both measures of physical demands were included in the analyses. The distribution of physical demands in different job groups and wards are presented, variance analysis models are employed, and logistic regression analysis is used to analyze the association between measures of physical demands and LBP.

RESULTS

In combination, hospital ward and job category explained 56.6% and 23.3% of the variance in the self-reported physical demands measured as the daily number of patient handling tasks and as the score on the physical load index, respectively. When comparing the 6% with the highest exposure the prevalence odds ratio (POR) for LBP was 5.38 (95% CI 2.03-14.29) in the group performing more than 10 patient handling tasks per day and 2.29 (95% CI 0.93-5.66) in the group with the highest score on the physical load index.

CONCLUSION

In specialized hospital wards the daily number of patient handling tasks seems to be a more feasible measure of exposure when assessing the risk of LBP compared to more advanced measures of physical load on the lower lumbar spine.

摘要

背景

下背痛(LBP)是医护人员中常见的健康问题。多项工作任务和工作姿势与LBP风险增加相关。本研究的目的是比较两种自我报告的体力需求测量方法及其与LBP的关联(每日患者搬运任务数量和霍尔曼体力负荷指数)。

方法

向丹麦一家医院的精神科和骨科病房的535名医院员工发放了问卷。其中411人(77%)填写并返回了问卷。分析仅纳入在两种体力需求测量方法上均无缺失值的373名受访者。呈现了不同工作群体和病房中体力需求的分布情况,采用方差分析模型,并使用逻辑回归分析来分析体力需求测量方法与LBP之间的关联。

结果

综合来看,医院病房和工作类别分别解释了以每日患者搬运任务数量和体力负荷指数得分衡量的自我报告体力需求方差的56.6%和23.3%。当将暴露程度最高的6%人群进行比较时,每天进行超过10次患者搬运任务的组中LBP的患病率比值比(POR)为5.38(95%可信区间2.03 - 14.29),体力负荷指数得分最高的组中为2.29(95%可信区间0.93 - 5.66)。

结论

在专科医院病房中,与评估下腰椎体力负荷的更先进方法相比,每日患者搬运任务数量在评估LBP风险时似乎是一种更可行的暴露测量方法。

相似文献

4
Non-specific low back pain: occupational or lifestyle consequences?非特异性下腰痛:职业因素还是生活方式因素导致的后果?
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015 Dec;127 Suppl 5:S277-81. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0770-2. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
5
Low Back Pain (LBP), work and absenteeism.腰痛、工作与旷工
Work. 2020;65(2):463-469. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203073.
10

本文引用的文献

8
Low back pain.腰痛
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Dec;16(5):761-75. doi: 10.1053/berh.2002.0267.
9
Validity of a self-administered questionnaire for assessing physical work loads in a general population.
J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Aug;44(8):724-35. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200208000-00007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验